- Time
- Post link
why are they evil?
I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.
The truth about remakes... — Page 3
- Time
- Post link
Because Jane Austen is evil.
- Time
- Post link
Why do you think she is evil?
- Time
- Post link
I have written testimony to that effect.
- Time
- Post link
Care to share it?
- Time
- Post link
Warbler said:
Care to share it?
Yes yes yes, do please share it!
- Time
- Post link
ChristophMer said:
Warbler said:
Care to share it?
Yes yes yes, do please share it!
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
AVATAR is Dances with Wolves, Pocahontas, Ferngully and other movies, IN SPACE!
http://www.thefunnyblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/avatar_pocahontas.jpg
- Time
- Post link
^This
- Time
- Post link
Not to mention him ripping himself off with all of the stuff from Aliens.
- Time
- Post link
Bingowings said:
ChristophMer said:
Warbler said:
Care to share it?
Yes yes yes, do please share it!
your written testimony does not convince me.
- Time
- Post link
Warbler said:
Bingowings said:
ChristophMer said:
Warbler said:
Care to share it?
Yes yes yes, do please share it!
your written testimony does not convince me.
Quelle surprise :-D
- Time
- Post link
DuracellEnergizer said:
Warbler said:
The only problem with that is that the guy that remade Psycho might qualify as someone that loves and respects the original.
Hmm. Yes. Perhaps I should also add that the person who remakes a film shouldn't just love/respect it, but also have something significantly new to bring to the table; if you're just going to regurgitate a movie without putting a fresh spin on it, then what's the point?
Like "The Wicker Man" remake? Had some very interesting points to make about male/female dichotomy, and a bold vision of bees/matriarchal society imagery to layer on the original film. Must have been a perfect remake.
- Time
- Post link
TheBoost said:
DuracellEnergizer said:
Warbler said:
The only problem with that is that the guy that remade Psycho might qualify as someone that loves and respects the original.
Hmm. Yes. Perhaps I should also add that the person who remakes a film shouldn't just love/respect it, but also have something significantly new to bring to the table; if you're just going to regurgitate a movie without putting a fresh spin on it, then what's the point?
Like "The Wicker Man" remake? Had some very interesting points to make about male/female dichotomy, and a bold vision of bees/matriarchal society imagery to layer on the original film. Must have been a perfect remake.
*bees*
I guess all the Body Snatcher films (excluding the one with Commander Bond and Virginia Woolf in) Carpenter's, The Thing and Cronenberg's The Fly had something new to say and were films in their own right.
But like The Wicker Man they were adapted from an already existing story.