Tobar said:
It's only ever been vague to us. As to the scope, they are called the "wars" so I hardly think the word "incident" is fitting. As to what side or in what capacity the clones were involved was never implied. Though I agree the reveal that they were cloned slaves used by the Republic was more than a bit of a let down.
What I meant by "incident" is that it wasn't important to the saga (or to the EU for that matter). And you're correct that, EU aside, nothing was implied about which side or in what capacity the clones were involved, but many assumed that the clones and the Republic were on opposite sides.
ATMachine said: That's exactly what GL originally thought of it as
Where did you read/hear this?