darth_ender said:
TV's Frink said:
generalfrevious said:
How can any human being murder another human being that can survive outside the mother? It makes me want to throw up.
darth_ender said:
I agree with your last two sentences very much.
I'm sorry I make you guys want to throw up.
I think if you pay attention to all my posts, including my previous post in this topic, you will see that I am open to exceptions. You know my stance and I really am sorry for the decision you had to make, but I don't feel you need to continually bring it up for sympathy whenever I share my general opinion. Clearly I am referring to people who do so for any reason other than genuine need.
On the other hand, there are many other ways you make me want to throw up ;)
I'm pretty sure other people would be more diplomatic but me being me I think you are being a bit of a cunt here, hopefully not deliberately but I feel it needs to be said.
The idea that a bunch of barely formed cells is a human being with a soul (whatever that is) is a huge leap in the dark and you may take some people with you.
But the main course of the argument is that by late term the bunch of cells is practically a baby with a nervous system and while some of us are happy to shoot nails into the heads of pigs with arguably as much if not more awareness in the name of bacon for breakfast, infanticide is a justifiable and pretty much universal no-no.
If you read this thread from cover to cover you find a lot of people using the earlier proposition to justify insensitive over-arching comments advocating a description of abortion as infanticide. Usually blaming women for the situation because guys are too busy getting their end away to make sure they lady has 1000% control over her body chemistry.
Frink's situation was horrible, the same with my sister.
Reminding people that abortion isn't just *filthy whores pulling the chain on the unholy toilet basin of their private parts is important. It puts the conversation back into balance.
There is a general assumption made by people, mostly of a religious bent that what they say be it sensible or utterly evil and based on nonsense is beyond question or debate.
It isn't and for the originator of the thread to label the testimony of someone who has had to make the sort of decisions covered by the thread title as continually brought up for sympathy, is just rotten.
You should be ashamed.