logo Sign In

Post #681452

Author
MrBrown
Parent topic
The Controversial Discussions Thread (Was "The Prejudice Discussion Thread" (Was "The Human Sexuality Discussion Thread" (Was "The Homosexuality Discussion Thread")))
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/681452/action/topic#681452
Date created
3-Jan-2014, 3:33 PM

RicOlie_2 said:

MrBrown said:

A page which write such sh*t http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_smokescreen_putting_young_mens_health_at_risk cannot be taken serious...

 First of all, that was written by a different author, secondly, what are your reasons against what that articles says (BTW, I don't have a position here as I don't know enough facts, but I would like to hear your reasons for condemning the article as [a four letter word]).

 I just started with the "How much worse do the risks of gay sex have to be before it rates the same public health warnings as smoking?" it is not only the "gay" sex that has the dangers. It is plain the unprotectet sex (without condom) between two persons, no matter if gay or heterosexual sex...

This part nullifies the complete legitimation of the whole text.

Even if it might be a different author, it is the same homepage, and they won't write anything against what they beliefe.

How much worse do the risks of gay sex have to be before it rates the same public health warnings as smoking? - See more at: http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_smokescreen_putting_young_mens_health_at_risk#sthash.H3n0mrHp.dpuf
How much worse do the risks of gay sex have to be before it rates the same public health warnings as smoking? - See more at: http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_smokescreen_putting_young_mens_health_at_risk#sthash.H3n0mrHp.dpuf"