logo Sign In

Post #681385

Author
RicOlie_2
Parent topic
The Controversial Discussions Thread (Was "The Prejudice Discussion Thread" (Was "The Human Sexuality Discussion Thread" (Was "The Homosexuality Discussion Thread")))
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/681385/action/topic#681385
Date created
3-Jan-2014, 10:52 AM

TV's Frink said:

RicOlie_2 said:

TV's Frink said:

You haven't answered my core question - why shouldn't they be involved romantically?

 And you haven't answered my question, on which my answer of your question is dependent.

So once again, how do you define "romantic relationship"? I gave my rough definition, so please give yours. I already answered your question as best as I was able with what you gave me, but I can't be any more specific without your clarification.

 I fail to see how my definition of romantic relationship is in any way relevant.  I define it essentially as you do, but I want to know why two consenting adults shouldn't hold hands, shouldn't kiss, shouldn't snuggle on the couch and watch their favorite show.

 Alright, that's all I needed. Some people have a weaker definition of romantic. Perhaps my definition is still stronger than yours, but I am now able to explain.

I don't think it's really wrong on its own, but it's where it might lead. If these people have a strong sexual attraction to each other, why bother forming such a relationship knowing that they won't be able to marry or have sex? They are likely to step over the line at some point, as such a relationship cannot be maintained indefinitely. I say let them be friends, but leave it at friends because that leaves them two steps away from stepping over the line instead of one.