logo Sign In

Post #681295

Author
RicOlie_2
Parent topic
The Controversial Discussions Thread (Was "The Prejudice Discussion Thread" (Was "The Human Sexuality Discussion Thread" (Was "The Homosexuality Discussion Thread")))
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/681295/action/topic#681295
Date created
3-Jan-2014, 12:18 AM

TV's Frink said:

RicOlie_2 said:

TV's Frink said:

TV's Frink said:

In both cases...why are you against romantic relationships?  Especially if sex is not involved?

 RO_2, care to answer?  The cases were homosexuality and incest.

 Ah, yes, I forgot to reply to this one earlier.

First of all...having that kind of relationship with a person related to you seems just plain weird, but I think it's more that there's no reason to believe that it would remain non-sexual romantic relationship.

Also, this heavily depends on your definition of romance. Can you define "romance" and "romantic relationship"?

 I agree it seems weird, but weird does not equal wrong.

You were the one who said you were against homosexual relationships, even if non-sexual, so I'm not sure why you need me to define the terms for you.

 If you don't think it's wrong, perhaps we have different things in mind when we use the word "romance." I just wanted to clear that up.

I don't think there's anything wrong with two homosexual guys or girls being friends whatsoever, but I don't think they should date or maintain a romantic relationship.

By romantic I mean they are in love, they feel sexually attracted to each other, they share kisses and hold hands*, etc.

*I don't think kissing and holding hands is a requirement for a romantic relationship, just that it is usually involved.