RicOlie_2 said:

I meant insulting people, not making jokes.

"Then I demand my right to shot the one who is insulting me, because I took my honor."

(No I don't think killing someone is the correct answer to an insult, I just want to show that, what you demand, can, and will start some kind of chain reaction, ending in what I "demanded". Insult someone always has to face consequences, but it has not neccesary to be always some kind of lawyer needed consequences. If you insult someone in a bar, you mostly would only get a bloody nose.)

I don't even see it to be a right for me to insult someone, because an insult is an action directly AGAINST someone. It is a right to have a different opinion. Even to express the opinion, but I don't think it is a right to act against someone, because he doesn't match your opinion.

And here is the point:

Sure the anti-homosexual-marriage demonstrants have their right to say "In my opinion it is not right that homosexuals get married." But often it is more that they don't express their opinion, but try to act against the people trying to get equality rights. (And there are also exsamples the way around, not questioning that.)

In my opinion the anti-homosexual-marriage movement is very wrong, because they base (I would say "all") their arguments on hate and antique texts, which have nothing to do with a stat legislative.

You see the difference between the sentence: "homosexuals shall burn" and "I don't believe you are right with equal marriage rights."

With whom you would prefer to discuss the topic? :)