logo Sign In

Post #68025

Author
Klingon_Jedi
Parent topic
SE Changes
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/68025/action/topic#68025
Date created
28-Sep-2004, 12:23 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: jimbo
When people complain about changes that good it almost makes me glad that Lucas is doing what he is doing. I can by the film history arguement. It would be kind of nice to see what was state of the art for that time. I also can by the Greedo shoots first or dialog change arguement. But how in the love of god can you possibly think changes like the new wampa, cloud city, new dewbacks, new sarlacc, better ship takeoffs, and livly cities don't improve the scene. These changes vastly improved the movie. Argueing otherwise makes absolutly no sense.


"Why!! Why don't you think exactly like I do!!!! How can I possibly be wrong on a subject that shouldn't have an incorrect answer!!!! Why can't you see that what I say goes!!!!! How dare you all have a contrasting opinion!!!!"

Jimbo, in all seriousness, that's what you sound like. For Pete's sake, grow up and realize that everyone one is different and there's nothing wrong with that. If you won't repect our opinions, leave, as we have no reason then to respect yours.

By the way, the ending to Rouge Squadron III - Rebel Strike featured the longer cut of the ending to RotJ, minus planets and ghosts, yet has Yub nub. Seems even the makers are with us, regardless of the Se shots troughout. Battle front is loaded with nothing but pan and scan SE shots, which I think was intentional.