TV's Frink said:
timdiggerm said:
TV's Frink said:
RicOlie_2 said:
TV's Frink said:
I think you guys say you love homosexuals so you don't have to feel bad for treating them as second-class citizens.
"We don't hate homosexuals, we just judge them for being morally bankrupt due to the thing that makes them homosexuals."
It's bullshit.
^ This.
Having sex with the opposite sex is not what makes one heterosexual. In the same way, having sex with the same sex is not what makes one homosexual. Having sex outside of marriage is what we consider wrong, not being sexually attracted to the same sex.
How convenient that only heteros are allowed to marry.
"It's okay to be homosexual - but surprise, you can't marry, so you can't have sex!"
I've always thought that Catholic Sexual Ethics does have at least one piece of logic going for it: All sex has to be potentially reproductive in nature. Thus, the prohibition on homosexual acts is consistent, and doesn't necessarily stem from reasoning which doesn't affect heterosexual couples.
No sex for sterile couples! No sex for people in their seventies!
God sure does have some illogical rules.
That isn't true. I gave an answer for that...not sure if it was in this thread or the other one (my Catholic one).