
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I must be a nice guy to create all these personalized threads for others.
I must be a nice guy to create all these personalized threads for others.
Dude, you're better than this.
TV's Frink said:
Dude, you're better than this.
This.
No, it's at the end of the sentence. There's no need to capitalize it.
:p
TV's Frink said:
Dude, you're better than this.
true, but HotRod was acting like a jerk.
It's like he's being a hypocrite, a bigot, and a jerk by making this thread. Hypocritebigotjerkception.
I kid.
HotRod was being a jerk, but I think the best attitude to have is not to be hypocritical yourself, but just to ignore him.
No offense, I just don't think this is the best way to react.
Warbler said:
HotRot
Ok then.
oops. It was typo and it has been corrected.
I do appreciate that you are acting in my defense, or at least in defense of my thread, but I propose that we just ignore him until he smartens up.
u kno? i rilly hayt stped pipol on da internet hoo tipe wit terrble grammer
I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.
mee 2 its is sew anoying adn i wish thay woodnt doo that
Why are you typing like that?
I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.
What's a playgroud?
Cut darth_ender some slack! Maybe he has a cold. :)
And a MAJOR hit from Mr. Cobb. darth_ender, your rebuttal?
I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.
Tack said:
u kno? i rilly hayt stped pipol on da internet hoo tipe wit terrble grammer
There are plenty of teenage girls who type like this with a straight face.
"omg did u c todds truk?? we got drunk n cops puled us ova last nite lmfao"
*shudder*
^That's why I'm for eugenics and controlled breeding.
^ I can get behind that, yes.
I don't recall typing like that. No, there is no need for rebuttal. We are all hypocrites. We all preach things we don't always perform. In any case, he was being a huge jerk. Yesterday he was really being horrible, and I wanted it to be made clear. If it makes me a jerk to point it out in someone else, well that's too bad for me then. Maybe it's an overreaction, but his behavior is consistent, and it might do him some good to realize that publicly. Maybe I'll change my ways and apologize, and perhaps he is best ignored, but for now, I really feel passionate that he needed a public castigation.
darth_ender said:
I must be a nice guy to create all these personalized threads for others.
Judge not least thee be judged in possession of magic pants :-P BTW your OCD is showing my dear :-D
darth_ender said:
I don't recall typing like that. No, there is no need for rebuttal. We are all hypocrites. We all preach things we don't always perform. In any case, he was being a huge jerk. Yesterday he was really being horrible, and I wanted it to be made clear. If it makes me a jerk to point it out in someone else, well that's too bad for me then. Maybe it's an overreaction, but his behavior is consistent, and it might do him some good to realize that publicly. Maybe I'll change my ways and apologize, and perhaps he is best ignored, but for now, I really feel passionate that he needed a public castigation.
Agreed
VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.
There is a difference between occasional personal hypocrisy and historically maintained institutional hypocrisy (especially when it comes from the really wacky sources and is the cause of death and suffering).
The Church has never endorsed the molestation of young boys. I can understand if you say that its teachings regarding marriage and celibacy lead to that inevitable end, but as it is strongly prohibited along with homosexuality, it does not qualify as institutionalized hypocrisy. You may accurately call it foolishness, but not hypocrisy.
And I've yet to read something kind from HodRod, so I'm convinced his behavior is not occasional.
This thread will not accomplish anything. Oh, and churches have shielded child molesters in the past, so there is at least some element of truth to what he said.