I recently read the Lucas interview in Entertainment Weekly, which puts his comments in a slightly different perspective. I'm really beginning to get the idea that what GL and his fellow "artists" want from the current copyright regime is something more along the lines of the protections software compaines enjoy i.e. you don't own a piece of art-- you have a licence to use a piece of art for a set period with few restrictions, or an unlimited period with many restrictions. This is a stand I cannot condone, because as far as I'm concerned, once you own a DVD of a movie, it should be yours to do with as you wish, even if that means something I may not agree with, like the ClearPlay content filtering system.