I don't. You don't mess with nuclear weapons in this kind of movie. If Nolan did not want to piss off the audience, he would have stuck to the rules of physics. Hell, I would have liked it if the superhero actually failed to save the city in this film, and that he died and the city is destroyed. It would have made fanboys angry, but at least I would respect the man for taking a big risk (which BTW is nonexistent in Hollywood nowadays), and IMO it would have been an interesting take on Batman and add depth. As time passed, he would have been seen as the true visionary that people claim he is, instead of the turning point into mediocrity.
Post #667442
- Author
- generalfrevious
- Parent topic
- Batman/Christopher Nolan rant
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/667442/action/topic#667442
- Date created
- 26-Oct-2013, 1:54 PM