chyron8472 said:

I wouldn't suggest using the word "crappy" in the documentary. It sounds amateurish and unprofessional. "Poor", "inferior", "low quality", "substandard" or other such words would be better.

Not only that, but the GOUT gets "crappy" while the SE gets "manipulated" and "questionable". The GOUT deserves plenty of disrespect, but the SE's deserve stronger wording than whatever language gets applied to the GOUT.

EDIT: SE terms could be "revisionist", "dated, anachronostic CGI effects", "heavily edited to the point they no longer resemble the films we love". Okay, that last one is a mouthful, admittedly...