- Time
- Post link
Leg porn?
The blue elephant in the room.
Are Muslims really trying to take over, or are some people just suffering from Islamaphobia? — Page 25
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
What that's supposed to imply is beyond me. But as an intelligent man if your unwilling to give a response to my question than fair enough.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
^Definitely not porn.
- Time
- Post link
Bingowings said:
Darn, I almost got that one.
- Time
- Post link
Obviously bingos hero.
- Time
- Post link
What are you trying to say?
- Time
- Post link
I'm not TRYING to say anything. I said it. Obviously Bingos hero.
- Time
- Post link
Super old, but worth it if you haven't seen it.
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
^Definitely not porn.
- Time
- Post link
Darn.
- Time
- Post link
Hey, it's me. said:
I'm not TRYING to say anything. I said it. Obviously Bingos hero.
Q: How many Bingos are there?
A: All of them.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
This thread has drifted into obscure waters and is currently beset by some rather irrelevant turbulence. Lol
- Time
- Post link
Hey, it's me. said:
http://tellmamauk.org/call-on-home-secretary-to-ban-visit-by-pam-geller-Robert-spencer/
So, where were the same voices asking for this man to be banned?
http://huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/06/19/Saudi-preacher-Mohammad-al-arefe_n_3465941.html
Hypocrisy in action.
I'm a little confused. Are you saying that it's a good thing the conservative Huffington Post brought this to our attention? Liberal media would sweep this sort of thing under the rug? Or are you bemoaning our hypocritical relationship with Saudi Arabia, caused by liberals?
"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars
- Time
- Post link
No you misunderstand. Never mind who posted the stories, they are what they are. The fact is two people (irrespective of their views) were recommended by a (Muslim) shadow MP to be refused entry to the UK, whilst an extreme Saudi hate preacher who condones sectarian violence amongst Muslims was allowed entry to sermon at UK mosques without so much as a whimper. That's my point.
- Time
- Post link
Hey, it's me. said:
No you misunderstand. Never mind who posted the stories, they are what they are. The fact is two people (irrespective of their views) were recommended by a (Muslim) shadow MP to be refused entry to the UK, whilst an extreme Saudi hate preacher who condones sectarian violence amongst Muslims was allowed entry to sermon at UK mosques without so much as a whimper. That's my point.
And your basis for blaming this on the liberals is...?
"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars
- Time
- Post link
Because the liberal Muslim shadow MP Keith Vaz was sharp enough to go on TV (the BBC I might add. Shock! Horror!) to berate these two people as wanting to come and incite hatred, but was mysteriously silent about Al Arefe. Who has condoned wife beating, secterian violence and all manner of nasty things. Vaz himself has a particularly murky past. Now you tell me. Is this liberal hypocrisy?
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
Sorry for the slight ot.com off-topic meme detour, but...
Bingowings said:
Not porn?
- Time
- Post link
That's very creepy.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Hey, it's me. said:
Because the liberal Muslim shadow MP Keith Vaz was sharp enough to go on TV (the BBC I might add. Shock! Horror!) to berate these two people as wanting to come and incite hatred, but was mysteriously silent about Al Arefe. Who has condoned wife beating, secterian violence and all manner of nasty things. Vaz himself has a particularly murky past. Now you tell me. Is this liberal hypocrisy?
Holy shit! A politician with a personal bias and an agenda? Call the press!
One mistake you have made through and through on this thread is lumping people together under labels. There are those Muslim immigrants that are trying to take over, and then there are the liberals who are fighting a war against your rights who are welcoming the teaching of Islamic violence while barring those who may be anti-Muslim from the country.
You place all liberals and all Muslims in tiny categorized baskets. If you'd get to know them as people, you'd find we all have varying beliefs, goals, and agendas. It isn't some big conspiracy. You have some Muslims who believe in violence as means to an end, and you have some politicians with agendas.
- Time
- Post link
I respect your opinion C3PS. But you have absolutely no idea to the extent of the problem.
http://patriotaction.net/video/out-of-time-radical-islam
and this was 2 years ago.
- Time
- Post link
Hey, it's me. said:
Because the liberal Muslim shadow MP Keith Vaz was sharp enough to go on TV (the BBC I might add. Shock! Horror!) to berate these two people as wanting to come and incite hatred, but was mysteriously silent about Al Arefe. Who has condoned wife beating, secterian violence and all manner of nasty things. Vaz himself has a particularly murky past. Now you tell me. Is this liberal hypocrisy?
Ok, so one liberal responded to one and not the other. Your posts made it seem like a movement.
"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars
- Time
- Post link
Look if after doing some proper research you nonchalantly think, 'ah it's just a load of scaremongering' then that's fine. I suggest you research Robert Spencer and Douglas Murray before you make that claim though. And if your a lefty/liberal type then leave your pre ordained notions at the door and do so with an open mind. Then, and only then, make that claim. Just saying.