Warbler said:

ok

none of these are in wedding dresses yet they still look silly to me.

I think the top one looks perfectly fine. The middle one isn't exactly to my taste, and he's definitely going for a genderbent style. However, I can see how you would consider them silly-looking. But I can't for the life of me figure out how the bottom one looks at all silly or even feminine in the slightest (assuming it's the preconceived notions of "femininity" being used outside of their "proper" context that are throwing you). He looks quite traditionally manly, and I'd half expect him to be on his way to a caber toss. He might as well just be wearing shorts. If you squinted, that's probably what he'd look like.

EDIT: Worth pointing out. Jesus didn't wear pants. He wore unbifurcated garments, the category to which a skirt and dress belong. I certainly hope you wouldn't tell Jesus he looked silly and for him to put on some damn pants because he's offending your traditional sensibilities. =P