logo Sign In

Post #642474

Author
Warbler
Parent topic
I'm a feminist!
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/642474/action/topic#642474
Date created
31-May-2013, 10:11 PM

Mrebo said:

Warbler treasures those simpler times.

yes this, exactly.  If I could work my will, there would be no homosexuals, everyone would be straight and be fine with it.   No one would want to be gay and no one would want to switch genders.  Things would be so much simpler that way.  No offense to homosexuals or transgenders intended. 

Gaffer Tape said:

Warbler said:

Gaffer Tape said:

"Oh good God"?  Would you please care to elaborate?

 I thought it was quite self explanatory. 

Yet again call me a prude and old fashion, but I just don't get the idea of a man dressing like a woman.  Sorry.

Fair enough.  I also don't get the idea of why people ever wore spats, but if you were to post a picture of yourself showing off your new footwear, I'd like to think I wouldn't feel compelled to so strongly invoke the name of a deity over it...

from wikipedia, about the reason for spats: "Their intended practical purpose was to protect shoes and socks from mud or rain"

TV's Frink said:

Warbler said:

Leonardo said:

Warbler said:

Gaffer Tape said:

Aw, come on, Warbler. I come back after all this time and already there's a *sigh*.  I really do want to know... when you're using the bathroom, a state most people regardless of orientation would consider less than attractive, what does someone's sexuality matter?  Why does it make you feel more comfortable to pretend all men are straight when you're in there?  If you happen to catch an accidental wandering eye when you're peeing, does it ultimately make any practical difference what that person is attracted to, even if you somehow managed to find out with no uncertainty?  Is there going to be any other outcome besides you finishing your business, washing your hands (hopefully), and going about your life?

call me a prude, but I don't want anyone looking my stuff when I am doing my business.  Straight men would have no desire to look at my stuff where as a gay man might, so I guess it just makes me more comfortable to assume all the men in the restroom are straight.  Again call me a prude and call me old fashioned, but I think men's and women's bathrooms should be kept separate.  It has worked fine for years and I just don't want to my business at a urinal when ladies are present.  

but why would anyone want to look at other people's junk while they're doing their business? unless you're that small percent of the population that's into that sorta thing, you're not gonna do that.

 Straight men would have no desire to look at my stuff where as a gay man might...

Assuming and self-absorbed much?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQZmCJUSC6g

How am I assuming too much by assuming a gay man would want to look a man's stuff where as a straight would not?  

and I don't think it is vain to not want people looking at your stuff.

Ok, so I assume you'd be fine pissing next to a lesbian, then?

no, sorry, again I would not be fine doing my business at a urinal with females present, be they straight or gay.

Gaffer Tape said:

Uh-oh.  You've opened that door.  What if it were Chaz Bono?  What bathroom should Chaz go to?

That is to say, Warb, how do you feel about transgendered people in your bathroom?  And by your bathroom, I mean your hypothetical public bathroom.

really?  *sigh* . . .

If they are a man before the operation, ok.    If they are a man after the operation, ok.    If they are a woman before the operation, not ok.   If they are a woman after the operation, not ok.    And I mean ok as in I am fine with doing my business at the urinal with them in the room, and not ok as in I am not fine with doing my business at the urinal with them in the room.