CP3S said:

DominicCobb said:

if they keep up the quality, this will easily be one of the greatest film trilogies ever.

Wow! No offense, but some of you guys never fail to surprise me with how willing you are to consume and enjoy pure shit. If you enjoyed it, great. But seriously, one of the greatest film trilogies ever?

This is why Orci, Kurtzman, Abrams, and Bay are some of the hottest names as well as the go to guys in Hollywood right now. Mix some dog awful but sometimes quipy dialogue over a tried and true (and tired) plot, add pretty lights and explosions, a few pairs of tits and some hot young faces, and BAM! Hollywood magic! Enthralled audiences! Raking in money by the millions!

Ugh!

None taken. While I realize some people don't like these movies, I have to say I'll never understand how people could compare them to Michael Bay. I don't know, agree to disagree.

Anyway, saying this could be one of the greatest film trilogies of all time does not mean that I think these are some of the greatest films of all time, because they aren't. I simply mean that when you when you really think about it, there are only a handful of really great film trilogies (I could go through them but I do not think here is really the place, but really, think about how many great trilogies there are). A good film trilogy to me is one that keeps a consistent high quality. The prospect of these new Star Trek films having a third film of high quality to round out their trilogy excites me. But of course, if you think these movies are pure shit, then you wouldn't understand that.

SilverWook said:

I had those emotions too. In 1982! ;)

Ha, ha, well I guess I understand that. To me the WOK connection only made the emotions stronger.