generalfrevious said:

Plus, Nolan's films have a reputation for being too talky and more based on ideas instaead of visuals. In a visual medium like film, that's not really encouraged.

Exactly! That is why Christopher Nolan sucks as a director, and Michael Bay may well be one of the greatest directors we see in our lifetime. The man has the visuals down! BOOOM! KABASH! BAAAM! So many exploOSIANS! Such a good director!

Nolan is crap because he makes a different movie every time and goes with unique ideas nobody else is doing. Who really wants that! I don't want to be confused by seeing a movie that has a plot I haven't encountered in every other action movie made! Grrrrr! Inception hurt my brain. Momento almost put me in a coma. Who can wrap their heads around stuff like that?! Seriously! Nolan's movies have way too much talking in them, modern audiences don't want to hear talking! We want explosions and lingering closeup shots of women in tight clothing and witty one liners we've already heard from other movies.

Thank god for directors like Michael Bay! In twenty years he'll be remembered for his greatness. Nolan, he'll just be remembered... well, he won't be. Old people will still watch the boring twenty year old Batman movies maybe, and a few of them might know Nolan made them, but nobody will care. A better director will make newer more action oriented Batman films with lots of explosions and lingering female ass shots and moderner technology, because that is what people want. Just hopefully they are made by a real filmmaker this time. Ug.