BmB said:

I hope to never see 24fps rear it's ugly flickery head again.

5k was great too, not quite 70mm. But defi better than 35mm.

3D effect still seemed a bit off tho. Bit of judder here and there.

I don't understand this attachment to 24fps, it only exists because film is expensive. I guess you like lots of blur and a very flat lifeless look? I want the film to disappear so I can see into the screen as if it was really there. In the same way 70mm does for clarity, 48fps does for motion.

I guess it's the same way that people playing video games have gotten so used to jaggies that they actually complain about antialiasing. Stupid.

I just don't play anything newer than SNES-era video games. ;)