I hope to never see 24fps rear it's ugly flickery head again.
5k was great too, not quite 70mm. But defi better than 35mm.
3D effect still seemed a bit off tho. Bit of judder here and there.
I don't understand this attachment to 24fps, it only exists because film is expensive. I guess you like lots of blur and a very flat lifeless look? I want the film to disappear so I can see into the screen as if it was really there. In the same way 70mm does for clarity, 48fps does for motion.
I guess it's the same way that people playing video games have gotten so used to jaggies that they actually complain about antialiasing. Stupid.
Post #616792
- Author
- BmB
- Parent topic
- 48 fps!
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/616792/action/topic#616792
- Date created
- 26-Dec-2012, 4:31 PM