asterisk8 said:

zombie84 said:

But when it was just a close up of an actor, still, but with all the subtle movements and stray hairs blowing in the wind...that, with the 3D, made the movie come alive for me in a way that no motion picture had before.

I actually envy that you had that experience. That's what I wanted to feel! :(

Is it possible that you think it didn't look right because you associate the lack of motion blur with crappy shot-on-video productions, such as Soap Operas?