logo Sign In

3D STAR WARS for the masses...has ARRIVED! — Page 41

Author
Time

One more thing.. Comparing Harmy's 1080 and 720 example (above) I concur that there is no difference in detail between the two.

Not Star Wars related, but now I'm thinking of all the assholes at dvdfile.com and thedigitalbits.com (with the exception of Robert Harris) with their group think and less than 20:20 vision (not bragging here but my vision is perfect) who over the years have 'dictated' what is quality and what is not quality. Not that these mentioned sites are influential these days but they once were and I always thought they were wrong. They were wrong. They didn't know the difference between a compression artifact, a macro block, and a pixel. Seriously. I wouldn't trust any of their recent reviews either. Just saying...

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Well, on my 27" full HD monitor, I can see a slight difference in detail in those pictures but it's really tiny - nowhere near the physical resolution difference between 1080p and 720p, which means that the current master has the amount of detail of a slightly above average theatrical print.

Author
Time

I'm honestly hoping they don't release all the 3D versions of the OT before Episode 7, and I'd be surprised if they did.  Episode 2 and 3 in 3D being right next to each other isn't surprising since both have so much digital elements that are already seperate, especially 3.  just think how amazing the opening battle will bein 3D, regardless of it being not so great in almost every other factor.  But for the OT, they don't have many digital, or atleast seperate, elements. They have to convert lots from scratch.  (wondering if they'll apply DNR to the footage...) Having them speed up the process would be horrible to the 3D experience.

Anyhow, I still hope they are planning to rerelease the originals.  I so badly want to see these movies in the theatres as I missed out previous chances.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Atilla the Hut said:

Harmy said:

Even if it was so, the current version is still stuck at 1080p plus it isn't really all that detailed to begin with:

720p has approx. half the resolution of 1080p, yet when scaled down to 720p and then upscaled back up to 1080p, the BD master definitely doesn't lose half the detail, so that effectively means that the 1080p master doesn't really use all the resolution 1080p has to offer.

Interesting...

I can tell the 720p image is a lower resolution than the 1080p image from the grain structure, BUT the detail appears identical. For the longest time I used to be under the impression a 35mm release print had some sort of amazing resolution. After I got a blu ray player and saw a few films then went back to the local cineplex, I started to question that. Then I found out that a release print was sub 720p on average due to the generation loss in contact printing. That and most new films used a 2k DI meaning if the HD version was sourced from the DI it would be hands down better than the release print (unless heavily compressed). Now the local cineplex has 4k DCI equipment so that's not a problem (and comfy seats... and a full bar)

Seeing this comparison makes me wonder how much extra detail could be extracted via a modern higher scan (with the OCN). For a film like SW, I would hate to see them not try.

 

Fang Zei said:

No, they used the OCN. That's why the '04 master still holds up in full HD: the scan Lowry was working with was capturing all that detail of the original source, even if the scanner was only 2K.

But you're still missing my original point, which is that Lowry was only working at HD resolution (whether it was 1080 anamorphic or 817, either way it was only 1920 horizontal). That's an hdtv master, not a cinema master. The prequels had actual 2K masters (Clones and Sith were shot at 1920, but the effects shots and everything else in the movie were rendered and finished at full 2K). I somehow doubt even Lucas would want the OT looking even worse than the prequels.

 

I knew what you meant. :) I would like to see a new scan too, for peace of mind, preferably at 8k. I've also read they scanned the OCN, but I also read (on this site I think, links in archived posts) that OCN=1997 SE which is an internegative two generations from the OCN. I know secret history of star wars says the OCN was disassembled and reassembled with SE footage, but that contradicts what Rick McCallum said in an old interview. The OCN was disassembled, but I don't think it was re-assembled with SE footage like Kaminski wrote. All the sources conflict with themselves and since we're not in the loop, who knows?

I just wanted to point out that the 2004 source was indeed scanned in at least 2k. The de-graining stuff was done at 1080p, but the scan was not 1080p like I've seen several people on the internet claim. Can't scan a scope film at 1080p. Well I guess you could, but it would be 1200x1080p or something like that

 

It was definitely scanned straight from the OCN. Jim Ward went out of his way to mention this during the press conference for the OT dvd release back in '04 with Hamill, Kershner and the Lowry guys in attendance. He said the '97 transfers were off IP, one generation away from the negative, and that detail had never been seen like this before.

emanswfan said:

I'm honestly hoping they don't release all the 3D versions of the OT before Episode 7, and I'd be surprised if they did.  Episode 2 and 3 in 3D being right next to each other isn't surprising since both have so much digital elements that are already seperate, especially 3.  just think how amazing the opening battle will bein 3D, regardless of it being not so great in almost every other factor.  But for the OT, they don't have many digital, or atleast seperate, elements. They have to convert lots from scratch.  (wondering if they'll apply DNR to the footage...) Having them speed up the process would be horrible to the 3D experience.

Anyhow, I still hope they are planning to rerelease the originals.  I so badly want to see these movies in the theatres as I missed out previous chances.

It wouldn't make much sense for them to wait until after Episode VII already hit theaters to put out Episodes IV, V and VI. They're coming early 2015 at the latest. That doesn't mean they still can't do a quality job, but they'd have to get going pretty soon. The 3D conversion of Titanic took 60 weeks to finish.

 

Author
Time

I've read somewhere that the 3D conversion of EpIV is like 90% done already.

Author
Time

I have a feeling both will fail. AOTC has always been the least popular film in the series. I didn't see TPM and I doubt I will pay money to see AOTC, but I would rather re-watch Episode I twice than sit through half of Episode II once. Episode III on the other hand, I actually enjoy, and look forward to seeing--but the Sin City sequel will capture that key older audience like me instead.

In short, the prequels will continue to fail. But it will be more than made up for with the originals. If Disney had designed this release and not Lucas they may have skipped the originals alltogether. I saw Star Wars six or seven times in 1997, and I will probably see it the same amount in 2014.

Author
Time

No 3-D reissue of ID4? We dodged a bullet there! ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Sadly there was a 2D release which I'm trying to forget.

Author
Time

I caught a 10:30 pm show with a friend on opening weekend, and we were the only two people in the whole theater. It quickly turned into a real life MST3K.

We yelled out a lot of Star Wars lines, and "Use the Schwartz, Lonestar!" during the finale.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

I caught a 10:30 pm show with a friend on opening weekend, and we were the only two people in the whole theater. It quickly turned into a real life MST3K.

We yelled out a lot of Star Wars lines, and "Use the Schwartz, Lonestar!" during the finale.

Always wanted to do that.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

I caught a 10:30 pm show with a friend on opening weekend, and we were the only two people in the whole theater.

ID4 was one of the biggest box office hits of the 90's. What theater did you see it in?!

Author
Time

 

Lucasfilm has confirmed the new theatrical release dates for the upcoming 3D versions of the next two films in the Star Wars prequel trilogy. Star Wars: Episode II Attack of the Clones will release, for a limited time only, in U.S. theaters on September 20, 2013, followed shortly by Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith on October 4, 2013.


"This trilogy really builds as it continues," says ILM's Dennis Muren, "and Episodes II and III feature shots of increased complexity and detail that really lend themselves to a deeper, more powerful 3D experience. Also, the action definitely ramps up as the galaxy plunges into war, so there are more opportunities to place the audience in the thick of some truly spectacular sequences."


Attack of the Clones includes thrilling chase scenes on the city-covered planet of Coruscant, intense ground battles on the rocky terrain of Geonosis, and the first-ever lightsaber duel featuring Jedi Master Yoda. Revenge of the Sith ends the prequel trilogy, telling the story of how Anakin Skywalker turns to the dark side to become the ultimate villain, Darth Vader, and takes viewers from lightning-fast dogfights to an epic lightsaber battle on the lava planet Mustafar.


International release dates will be announced soon. Keep checking StarWars.com for more news on the 3D releases of the Star Wars films.

Source

 

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

zombie84 said:

I didn't see TPM and I doubt I will pay money to see AOTC, but I would rather re-watch Episode I twice and get kicked in the balls a bunch of times than sit through half of Episode II once. 

Fixed.

Author
Time

Shocking! [/sarcasm]

If this turns out to be true, it'll no doubt be due to the poor performance of TPM 3D. Of course, if George had put aside his stubbornness re: the ideal viewing order and started with the OT in 3D, I guarantee the numbers would be completely different.

Every 27th customer will get a ball-peen hammer, free!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The whole thing was a balls up from the beginning.

If they wanted it to work they should have converted them all at the same time as a single investment and put them out in close succession to each other as a build up to the blu-ray release.

That way the cinema run would have promoted the discs which would also be available in 3D as an added gimmick.

Instead the discs came first and then there was the long well known gap between TPM:3D and AOTC:3D.

That way anyone thinking about seeing the films in anything other than the dodgy DVD sets would get the slightly differently dodgy blu-Ray sets instead of going to the pictures at a tenner plus a pop to see one and wait a year to see the next one.

Even I can see this.

Author
Time

Fang Zei said:

SilverWook said:

I caught a 10:30 pm show with a friend on opening weekend, and we were the only two people in the whole theater.

ID4 was one of the biggest box office hits of the 90's. What theater did you see it in?!

A multiplex that can't even be seen from the freeway. (I don't think the city will allow them to put up a flashy marquee as they sit surrounded by housing developments.) Unless you know it's there you'd never find it. It actually closed not long after Episode I came out, and sat empty for several years before being remodeled and reopened. You could eat at the Jack in the Box behind it and not realize a movie theater was across the way, the building is that nondescript.

I don't know how they compete against the slightly younger flashy IMAX equipped theater that sits right by the freeway a few miles away.

ID4 was actually playing on half the screens in every theater in the county, so it wasn't that hard to find a quiet late show at the time.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Considering how much work had probably been done, (not to mention the Blu Ray changes that seem to be intended for 3D) it's a lot of money down the hole to scuttle the whole thing now.

Will Episode One ever hit Blu Ray in 3D now?

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Nice way to say it's dead? Will audiences care after the new movie is out?

Arguably, they have spent more money on these conversions that a proper OT restoration would have cost. I can't imagine it's totally going into the crapper without even a Blu Ray release.

The larger question is this a Disney or Lucasfilm decision? I can't imagine Fox being too happy about this, as it was one last chance to make a little moolah.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

There's no question the OT could have been nicely taken care of for a fraction of this. The fucking Super Bowl ad alone.

Author
Time

There was an ad for TPM 3D during the Super Bowl?

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?