logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 179

Author
Time

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) 9/10 - Well, after I watched FYEO, I read somewhere that people consider it Moore's best Bond film. And yet, my memory told me that I thought TSWLM was Moore's best. I watched it, and I remember correctly. I love this movie. I believe like this, more than any other film, feels most like the Connery's. Lot of classic stuff here. Very exciting plot and action. Funny too. Only a few downsides. The score's a little too 70s at parts, and Barbara Bach doesn't really do a good job. Also, at times in the second half, it is a little too slow. Other than that, great film.

The Living Daylights (1987) 9/10 - I saw Moore's best, so I decided to jump ahead ten years and see Dalton's. I love this movie, too. In fact, each time I watch it, I like it more. Bond's a real guy again, thanks, in great part, to Dalton, who does a fine job as Bond. Pity he only did two. As with any good Bond film; the plot's interesting, the action's intense, and the score is first-rate (as it always is with John Barry). Yet, it suffers in much the same most Bond films do: by being too long. In this case I think the finger can be pointed at the portion in Afghanistan. Hate to sound like a broken record, but, other than that, great film.

Author
Time

Johnny Ringo said:

 

The world is not enough [on tv] ZERO BALLS.

 

Even in the theaters, this film has no balls.

“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison

Author
Time

I thought it did. Still do, though it is very flawed-because of the struggle between the director and having to hand off major sections of the film to the second unit. But primarily due to the incompetence of Purvis/Wade to deliver a competent script. There is so much potential for depth and meaning, and it is all thrown away.

Pit and the Pendulum (1961)-mad delicious genius, the second best of the series. 3.5 balls out of 4.

The Premature Burial (1962)-surprisingly effective, and Milland is a good substitute for Price, though I wish the final reveal had more breathing room. And Hazel Court. Yay! 3 balls out of 4.

Tales of Terror (1962)-I used to like this movie as a child, but it is severely flawed and already reveals a tiredness to the direction. Only the Black Cat segment really works because it deviates from Poe to create it's own fully developed sense of narrative, and leads to The Raven/Comedy of Terrors. 2.5 balls out of 4 wine tasters.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time
 (Edited)

20 Million Miles to Earth (1957) - 5.5/10

Earth vs. the Flying Saucers (1956) - 4.9/10

First Men in the Moon (1964) - 6.8/10

Author
Time

The Haunted Palace (1963). This is a silly and pointless film, based on HP Lovecraft instead of Poe. The cheapy sets really show, as does the pitiful makeup throughout. The only reason to sit through this is Vincent Price and the way he portrays being possessed by a vengeful ancestor. 1.5 balls out of 4 people who really really shouldn't piss off Vincent Price.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984) - 6/10

Legend (director's cut) (1985) - 5.6/10

Author
Time

Spaced Invaders (1990)

Hadn't seen this in years but remembered loving it when I was younger. It's still pretty fun and it's interesting seeing the animatronics not holding up as well as you had imagined they did when you were younger. I also love the concept of aliens mistaking a broadcast of Orsen Welles' War of the Worlds for a real invasion.

I think it's also important to note that this film's director is none other than Patrick Read Johnson. The man behind 5-25-77.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Maybe the upshot of the Disney deal will be we finally get to see 5-25-77 released, riding that wave of renewed interest in Star Wars.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SKYFALL

I agree with greenpenguino, this has to be the finest Bond movie, the perfect mix.....after watching a LOT of Bond recently on the 007 channel, this film marks 50 years nostalgically.

The cg dragons didn't bother me, but the DLP image just wasn't bright enough, especially in bright scenes where I was conscious of the screen material.

Cant wait for Bond 24

J

Author
Time

Silent Hill: Reve-whatever 3D (2012)

Unbelievably crap. Apart from one brief scene with Malcolm McDowell, avoid like the plague.

1 out of ten balls.

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

Jaitea said:

SKYFALL

I agree with greenpenguino, this has to be the finest Bond movie, the perfect mix.....after watching a LOT of Bond recently on the 007 channel, this film marks 50 years nostalgically.

The cg dragons didn't bother me, but the DLP image just wasn't bright enough, especially in bright scenes where I was conscious of the screen material.

Cant wait for Bond 24

J

There's a 007 channel!?

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Spent the last few hours of the Bond movies being available on Netflix in the US on the Cap's favorite, The Living Daylights. To sum up my opinion: really, REALLY good. John Barry's score shined more than it has ever before for me! I guess it makes sense that it was his last in the series. Dalton seems to have gotten a bad rap as Bond and given this movie I'm not sure why. Highly recommended. Probably the best serious one since From Russia with Love. It was nice to see a serious Bond movie that meets the middle ground between action and espionage, which I think the series struggles with from time to time.

I'll be coming back to it, but much like OHMSS I wouldn't call it a casual viewing movie. Have to be ready to get invested again.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Jaitea said:

SKYFALL

blah, blah blah.....after watching a LOT of Bond recently on the 007 channel, this film....blah blah blah

J

There's a 007 channel!?

Yeah it started beginning of Oct Sky UK

J

Author
Time

greenpenguino said:

Silent Hill: Reve-whatever 3D (2012)

Unbelievably crap. Apart from one brief scene with Malcolm McDowell, avoid like the plague.

1 out of ten balls.

It's so maddening.

The Silent Hill games (like the Resident Evil games) should be impossible to adapt badly.

Everything is designed from the world to the sounds, the tone is easy to describe but even most of the recent games can't grasp this.

It doesn't actual need a coherent plot or characters (it's one case where coherence is actually a hinderance to success).

Just get some Lynch fans to make it on the cheap digitally and then get a superb editor to polish it to a Hollywood standard (Hollywood circa 1979).  

Author
Time

The Adventures of Tintin (2011)

What a film - what a film indeed. There are so many things I could say about it - so many things indeed - but where would I begin, where would I finish? Such an undertaking would require superhuman endurance, and I don't thing I could even a halfway decent job. Therefore, I'll just describe the steps that were taken to make this movie.


1. Speilberg buys copies of The Crab with the Golden Claws and The Secret of the Unicorn

2. Speilberg hands the two books to a toddler then says "Here, read these, then write up a screenplay. I don't have all day, so chop-chop"

3. Toddler takes a pair of scissors, and goes to work cutting the books to pieces with gusto

4. Toddler grabs a handful of crudely-clipped panels and begins arranging them all out in what he hopes is a cohesive, sequential order, but just can't get the pieces to fit right

5. Toddler sets about glueing the panels down on a piece of paper, but does a bad job, mucking the whole thing up with sticky glue, wrecking some panels while all but destroying others

6. Toddler takes a set of crayons and begins scrawling a bunch of formless blobs, lines, and various scribbly shit all over the collage

7. Speilberg returns, and the toddler hands him the collage. Speilberg takes the incoherent mess and says "Awesome! Perfect! This is just what I say looking for! There'll be no need for further drafts or rewrites - we'll film it as it is!"


4/10, and I'm being generous.


Star Trek: Generations (1994) - 5/10

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Les Diaboliques (1955) - 8/10

M (1931) - 8.5/10

Black Narcissus (1947) - 9/10

The Phantom of the Opera (1925) - 7.5/10

 

I have to say the Criterion BRD of Black Narcissus is one of the most gorgeous things ever displayed on my TV. It was almost like watching an actual Technicolor print. Beautiful beyond words.

Author
Time

Masque of the Red Death-Corman's one attempt to go for broke, and a complete success. His finest hour, and Vincent is wonderful. 4 balls out of 4.

For Halloween got through the initial Universal trilogy:

Dracula, Frankenstein, The Mummy. Of these indisputable classics, I think Dracula is a far better film than people give it credit for and it is better than the animatedly technically superior Spanish version. Frankenstein seems like a far more modern film in nuance alone, but this is primarily from James Whale. Clive and Karloff are fantastic, but one can't help but get the feeling of the plot being a bit too oversimplified. Maybe I'm just spoiled by the heights of Bride. Of the the three, more and more over time I return to The Mummy which is easily the most underrated of the classic Universals. The most atmospheric, and possibly best shot, The Mummy is a timeless artifact haunted by Karloff's best performance , save for Bride. Despite being essentially Dracula in Egypt, the film has always worked well for me and has an intricate level of "horror" that is far more interesting and captivating than anything outright frightening. Plus I've always thought Zita Johan looks quite striking.

I think next I'll finally sit down with the 1925 original release version of Phantom of the Opera, which seems to answer my one problem with the 1929 version: the unnecessary scenes and subplots.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

The Devil's Backbone - 7.5/10

I really liked this film. Unsurprisingly, a lot young people who loved Pan's Labyrinth found this film "boring" and "not scary". Proof that expectations color perception. How some of these same people can enjoy the unremittingly boring Paranormal Activity movies boggles my mind. Apparently extended shots of empty rooms is more entertaining than a well-paced drama about loneliness and abandonment. And jump scares are cooler than existential horror, I guess.

Author
Time

 

IP MAN (2008) 5/10

 

 

“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison

Author
Time
 (Edited)

asterisk8 said:


The Devil's Backbone - 7.5/10

I really liked this film. Unsurprisingly, a lot young people who loved Pan's Labyrinth found this film "boring" and "not scary". Proof that expectations color perception. How some of these same people can enjoy the unremittingly boring Paranormal Activity movies boggles my mind. Apparently extended shots of empty rooms is more entertaining than a well-paced drama about loneliness and abandonment. And jump scares are cooler than existential horror, I guess.


I've never seen The Devil's Backbone, but you sure hit the nail on the head in regards to Paranormal activity; how such an unscary, unartistic, simplistic bore can be so popular boggles the mind.

...

Another Earth (2011) - 6.8/10

Star Trek: First Contact (1996) - 5/10

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986) - 6/10

Repulsion (1965) - 6/10

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:


Repulsion (1965) - 6/10

 

Why so low a score? I think it's one of the greatest horror movies ever made, a true psychological horror with an incredible lead performance, fantastic sound design, and the reveal in the last second of the film still haunts me. It's in my top 10 all-time favorite films.

Moonrise Kingdom - 8/10 - a beautiful, funny, and poignant coming-of-age story. Fails a little in the final act, but the two child actors in the lead roles were incredible.

Author
Time

asterisk8 said:



DuracellEnergizer said:

Repulsion (1965) - 6/10

 


Why so low a score? I think it's one of the greatest horror movies ever made, a true psychological horror with an incredible lead performance, fantastic sound design, and the reveal in the last second of the film still haunts me. It's in my top 10 all-time favorite films.


What can I say? I liked it, but I didn't like it enough. There's nothing wrong with the production values or performances, it just didn't strike that large a chord with me.

...

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991) - 6/10

UHF (1989) - 4.9/10

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Gargoyles (1972).

A truly wonderful awful film.

It looks like Pertwee era Doctor Who but it's the incredible characters and the 'no cliche too bad for us' attitude that I love about this film.

Grayson Hall is brilliant as a perpetually boozing motel owner.

She is a classy drunk, even when the van she's in is being attacked by the titular rubber unitards she refuses to drink out of the bottle and doesn't seem to drop her glass.

How Scott Glenn's career survived this is anyone's guess.

It demands to be remade, either seriously or as a musical.

The titles deserve a special mention.

What genius to make a typeface that looks like it's carved from radioactive snot.

3 five headed siamese chickens.