(Reason: The silly game of semantics continues...)

Again, then, why did you start this silly game of semantics, and why are you continuing it? Why is my use of the concept of "cheating" such anathema to you? I stand by my use of the term. I truly believe it applies and matches the definition point for point. But I'd much rather you actually debate my stance on the subject at hand than whether or not you think "cheating" is an appropriate term for it. Do you think that the outcome of the match did not conclude within its one second of remaining time? Do you think that point scored was outside of the boundaries of the match? If so, good, then we're in agreement. I'll call it unintentional cheating, and you can call it hippopotamus balloons if you want to. If not, fine, talk to me about your opinions on that, rather than continuing your silly game of semantics.