Sorry, Warb. I'm not trying to press the issue, and you certainly don't have to agree with me, but it is frustrating having to basically just repeat what I've already said. I'm sure you can relate.
At any rate, I do apologize if I was unclear. If so, I hope that my point has now been made clear.
Anyway, I find the 1972 issue interesting, and I'm doing further reading right now to make sure I understand it before I really give you my thoughts on it.