logo Sign In

Post #589006

Author
Darth Bizarro
Parent topic
Maul WAS to be Grievous at some point. See Here...
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/589006/action/topic#589006
Date created
7-Aug-2012, 7:00 PM

<p>I really think not having Maul be&nbsp;Grievous was a serious missed opportunity. &nbsp;By taking these two mostly uninteresting throw away bad guy and combining &nbsp;them they could have actually given him an interesting arc between the movies that would have provided a nice&nbsp;foreshadowing&nbsp;for what was to become of Anakin.</p>
<p>Sure, Clone Wars has done a decent job (I think) of spicing up Maul and Grievous, but these are suppose to be 2 of the 4 main villains in the films (really 3 since one of the villains want&nbsp;meant&nbsp;to be a "Phantom Menace") and that kind of character development shouldn't have been farmed out to the series, especially if you are going to have a different villain in each movie.</p>