I don't know what their source was, but I agree that it was probably from the 80s at the earliest...a vintage 70s print would have looked much, much worse than it did.
It looked great, though- untampered with digitally.
I don't know what their source was, but I agree that it was probably from the 80s at the earliest...a vintage 70s print would have looked much, much worse than it did.
It looked great, though- untampered with digitally.