logo Sign In

Dark Knight Rises - Now that we know the cast — Page 18

Author
Time
 (Edited)

well I have seen the movie and here is what I think:

Spoiler:

 

 

It had some good moments and it wasn't bad, but I liked Dark Knight  alot more.    I think Bane's mask hindered too much his ability to emote.   I also felt let down by the fights between Bane and Batman.   I wanted the climax of this movie to be an epic knock down drag out  fight to the death between Bane and Batman.   The fights weren't bad, but they could have been better.  I am appalled with what they did to Alfred in this movie.    Having him all of the sudden wish Wayne had not come back in Batman Begins and having him want Wayne to stop being Batman feels shoved in.   Neither movie showed any indication that Alfred felt anything close to this way and yet he supposedly felt this way the whole time.   I liked the John Blake character,  but I didn't like the Robin thing.   For one thing, Robin wasn't Robin's real name.  His real name was Dick Grayson.   Also Robin is supposed to be the boy wonder.   In the movie he is a grown man.   I also don't buy how he knows that Bruce was Batman.  Finally Robin is Batman's assistant, not his replacement.   And the brings us to the thing I hate most about this movie.    Bruce Wayne leaving Gotham with Catwoman.   That is so wrong on so many fronts.   Bruce Wayne would never stop fighting crime in Gotham, you'd have to kill him or disable him permanently to stop from crime fighting.   And I certainly can't see him leaving Gotham in the condition it after Bane and Talia were defeated.  Gotham was still a mess and criminals were still on the loose and police power was limited at best.  No way he'd leave it in that condition when Gotham still needed him.   And to go away with the Catwoman???  She is a criminal!  She set him up to get his ass beaten by Bane! She is partly responsible for all the death and destruction that he caused.   Also she is a thief, like the guy that murdered his parents!    I understand that they wanted to end the Batman series here, but they could have done it without this stupid ending.   They could have killed him off, exactly as they apparently had.   Having him die to save the city he loved would have been an excellent way to end the thing.    Mind you, I am not saying the movie is bad, it just has flaws.   But it still kept me entertained for two hours, so I would still say it is worth seeing. 

 

 

 

Author
Time

Warbler said:

Neither movie showed any indication that Alfred felt anything close to this way and yet he supposedly felt this way the whole time.

What about when he was crying when he saw Bruce tripping out on Scarecrow's fear dust?

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

I'll have to go back and watch that scene. 

Author
Time

Saw the IMAX version, and I liked it very much.  I felt that the Catwoman character was very similar to the Amanda thief character from The Highlander T.V. series.  I would have liked to have had Bane's prison seem a bit more remote. I liked the Blake story line. Someone who was truly inspired by not only Batman, but by the Wane family ethics. Best film that I have seen in the theaters in a very long time.

 

Also, I saw a poster in the theater that says the new James Bond film "Skyfall", will be released in IMAX. I will be seeing that on the big screen for sure.   

“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison

Author
Time

The following post is made of SPOILERS. I don't even know why you'd read this thread anymore if you didn't want to read SPOILERS. In particular, these are SPOILERS about the film's ending.

Warbler said:

I think Bane's mask hindered too much his ability to emote.

True, although it also imbued him with a certain level of creepy. Early in the film, his eyes are totally emotionless but his voice is great. Later in the film, even his eyes start to show things.

I also felt let down by the fights between Bane and Batman.   I wanted the climax of this movie to be an epic knock down drag out  fight to the death between Bane and Batman.   The fights weren't bad, but they could have been better.

They were indeed just two big guys punching each other. I can't think of a different way to do it, though, given that we have two big guys and they gotta punch.

I am appalled with what they did to Alfred in this movie.    Having him all of the sudden wish Wayne had not come back in Batman Begins and having him want Wayne to stop being Batman feels shoved in.   Neither movie showed any indication that Alfred felt anything close to this way and yet he supposedly felt this way the whole time.

I didn't have this issue at all. It's been pretty well established that Alfred wants Bruce to be a normal person, well recovered from the death of his loved ones and no longer overcome with grief. When he talks about having hoped Bruce wouldn't come back, it's only in the context of Bruce not coming back because he's found a new, good life somewhere else. When he doesn't want Bruce to be Batman, it's because he thinks Bruce will die as Batman. While the details like that haven't been spoken by Alfred previously, the motivation behind them was certainly present.

I liked the John Blake character,  but I didn't like the Robin thing.   For one thing, Robin wasn't Robin's real name.  His real name was Dick Grayson.   Also Robin is supposed to be the boy wonder.   In the movie he is a grown man.   I also don't buy how he knows that Bruce was Batman.  Finally Robin is Batman's assistant, not his replacement.

In terms of Batman continuity, this is certainly the only really awful thing in the film. But goodness, I'm impressed enough that Nolan put anything remotely related to Robin in one of his movies. It's a pretty good way for Robin to exist without Bruce essentially kidnapping and conscripting a child into service.

And the brings us to the thing I hate most about this movie.    Bruce Wayne leaving Gotham with Catwoman.   That is so wrong on so many fronts.   Bruce Wayne would never stop fighting crime in Gotham, you'd have to kill him or disable him permanently to stop from crime fighting.

Remember what Alfred said, early in the film, about how he hoped that Bruce would find peace. Bruce being at the cafe means that that's happened.

And I certainly can't see him leaving Gotham in the condition it after Bane and Talia were defeated.  Gotham was still a mess and criminals were still on the loose and police power was limited at best.  No way he'd leave it in that condition when Gotham still needed him.

This is exactly why he gave Robin the Batcave. Also, notice the part where he restored the Batsignal. He knows Gotham still needs a protector, and he didn't leave it protector-less.

And to go away with the Catwoman???  She is a criminal!  She set him up to get his ass beaten by Bane! She is partly responsible for all the death and destruction that he caused.   Also she is a thief, like the guy that murdered his parents!

No, there's more to her than that.

I don't really think that I need to say much more than that about her. She redeemed herself and proved which side she's on when she blew open the tunnel and then came back instead of escaping.

I understand that they wanted to end the Batman series here, but they could have done it without this stupid ending.   They could have killed him off, exactly as they apparently had.   Having him die to save the city he loved would have been an excellent way to end the thing.    Mind you, I am not saying the movie is bad, it just has flaws.   But it still kept me entertained for two hours, so I would still say it is worth seeing. 

The best thing about this movie is where they leave everyone at the end. You've made a lot of assumptions about where people have to go in life after this film, assumptions which, while possible, are not necessary.

Bruce can, now that he's a bit more sane and in control, return to being Batman when he chooses. Publicly, he's assumed dead in the Bane revolution, but he can return to Gotham with a story about not being on the island when the bridges blew and then hiding out in the rest of the world for awhile. Heck, maybe he'll even become a good businessman now and restore Wayne Industries. Alfred would certainly rejoin a stabler Bruce, when the time came.

And who's to say that Selina would stay clean forever? The Catwoman/Batman relationship has always been tumultuous, and it really isn't hard to imagine her going back to thievery, if you really want to enter into the endless-conflict state of comic books.

One of my favorite parts is how ambiguous they've made Ra's al Ghul's status. Is he alive or dead? Was Bruce hallucinating, or did he slip in and out of consciousness just long enough to enjoy a short visit from his former mentor? Nolan doesn't tell us, which allows him to avoid fantastical elements like Lazarus Pits without actually making al Ghul's fate definitive. At the end of Nolan's trilogy, all of Batman's classic villains are potentially alive and useable, except for Two-Face (a real loss, unfortunately, but necessary) and Bane.

Other than the whole Dick Grayson thing, the film leaves its world in a very good state. You can either imagine that this is the end of Bruce as Batman, it's all over... or things could return to a more familiar state. It's beautifully open ended, but not in a way that demands sequels.

ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project

Author
Time

Warbler said:

I'll have to go back and watch that scene. 

Yeah, I actually find Alfred's thing entirely plausible here, based mostly on Begins.  There was the scene Tobar mentioned as well as that exchange about, "When you came back and told me about this, the only thing that kept me from calling the men in the white coats was when you said this was not about thrill seeking."  And, of course, the scene in this film where Alfred freaks out is another Batman leads the police on a merry chase scene.  Also, Alfred's desire for Bruce not to come back was before he even knew anything about a Batman or a mission.  All he knew was that Bruce disappeared one day and never came back.  So, yeah, he is certainly supportive of Batman and even strongly believes in Batman, but his primary goal is to see Bruce happy.  And for him to do the Batman thing for a few years, followed by eight years of depressed seclusion, I can definitely see Alfred going, "Yeah, you've done your share.  It's time for you to think about you now," especially given that he believes that Bruce is only going back into the fight to die in a blaze of glory.

I can see where you're coming from on the ending, and the logistics of it you bring up are spot on.  This movie certainly took a lot more liberties with the mythos than we probably expected when Begins came out, and that was a bit jarring.  But like I said in my above thoughts, I'm okay with there being a Batman who can actually end.  Who can complete his mission in his own mind.  I guess that has a lot to do with my feelings of comic books, where Batman has been doing his same Batman thing unceasingly for over 70 years, with only the partial reboot ever 25 years or so to almost shake things up.  So I was excited to see some closure.  Also, it makes sense in this continuity because it had been set up since at least The Dark Knight.  That was all about the fact that he didn't want to be Batman anymore, he wanted to settle down with Rachel, and that he was hoping Harvey Dent would become his successor.

And, yeah, I agree with you about the Catwoman thing.  Also like I'd said, I wish her character had been explored more.  Because there's really no reason given that Bruce would respect her and not any other talented criminal besides, "Dur hur, you're purty!"  But then again, there's the Golden Age continuity that eventually has them settling down together, so I guess it's not entirely without precedent.  I suppose that's one of those things where an emotional payoff is more important than a logical one.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

timdiggerm said:

The best thing about this movie is where they leave everyone at the end. You've made a lot of assumptions about where people have to go in life after this film, assumptions which, while possible, are not necessary.

Bruce can, now that he's a bit more sane and in control, return to being Batman when he chooses.

if he intends to do that, why'd he make it look like Batman is dead?   No,  it is clear that Bruce intends to give up Batman forever and that is not the Bruce Wayne we know and love.

timdiggerm said:

And who's to say that Selina would stay clean forever?

nothing, my point is there is no way a Bruce would go away with a criminal,  especially one that set him up with Bane and is partly responsible for all the death and destruction he caused.

timdiggerm said:

One of my favorite parts is how ambiguous they've made Ra's al Ghul's status. Is he alive or dead?

it was clear in Begins that he is dead. 

timdiggerm said:

Was Bruce hallucinating, or did he slip in and out of consciousness just long enough to enjoy a short visit from his former mentor?

it was 100% clear to me that it was just an hallucination.  Ra Al Ghul is dead. 

 

Author
Time

timdiggerm said:

The following post is made of SPOILERS. I don't even know why you'd read this thread anymore if you didn't want to read SPOILERS. In particular, these are SPOILERS about the film's ending.

Warbler said:

I think Bane's mask hindered too much his ability to emote.

True, although it also imbued him with a certain level of creepy. Early in the film, his eyes are totally emotionless but his voice is great. Later in the film, even his eyes start to show things.

yeah come to think of it, at the end he was showing emotion with his eyes.

timdiggerm said:

I also felt let down by the fights between Bane and Batman.   I wanted the climax of this movie to be an epic knock down drag out  fight to the death between Bane and Batman.   The fights weren't bad, but they could have been better.

They were indeed just two big guys punching each other. I can't think of a different way to do it, though, given that we have two big guys and they gotta punch.

I still think it could have been improved upon. 

timdiggerm said:

I am appalled with what they did to Alfred in this movie.    Having him all of the sudden wish Wayne had not come back in Batman Begins and having him want Wayne to stop being Batman feels shoved in.   Neither movie showed any indication that Alfred felt anything close to this way and yet he supposedly felt this way the whole time.

I didn't have this issue at all. It's been pretty well established that Alfred wants Bruce to be a normal person, well recovered from the death of his loved ones and no longer overcome with grief. When he talks about having hoped Bruce wouldn't come back, it's only in the context of Bruce not coming back because he's found a new, good life somewhere else. When he doesn't want Bruce to be Batman, it's because he thinks Bruce will die as Batman. While the details like that haven't been spoken by Alfred previously, the motivation behind them was certainly present.

maybe I judged the Alfred thing too harshly,  I'll have to re-watch all three  movies and judge again. 

timdiggerm said:

I liked the John Blake character,  but I didn't like the Robin thing.   For one thing, Robin wasn't Robin's real name.  His real name was Dick Grayson.   Also Robin is supposed to be the boy wonder.   In the movie he is a grown man.   I also don't buy how he knows that Bruce was Batman.  Finally Robin is Batman's assistant, not his replacement.

In terms of Batman continuity, this is certainly the only really awful thing in the film. But goodness, I'm impressed enough that Nolan put anything remotely related to Robin in one of his movies. It's a pretty good way for Robin to exist without Bruce essentially kidnapping and conscripting a child into service.

I never thought of Bruce as kidnapping Grayson,  he adopted him.  

timdiggerm said:

And the brings us to the thing I hate most about this movie.    Bruce Wayne leaving Gotham with Catwoman.   That is so wrong on so many fronts.   Bruce Wayne would never stop fighting crime in Gotham, you'd have to kill him or disable him permanently to stop from crime fighting.

Remember what Alfred said, early in the film, about how he hoped that Bruce would find peace. Bruce being at the cafe means that that's happened.

Bruce would never give up fighting crime in Gotham, period end of sentence.

timdiggerm said:

And I certainly can't see him leaving Gotham in the condition it after Bane and Talia were defeated.  Gotham was still a mess and criminals were still on the loose and police power was limited at best.  No way he'd leave it in that condition when Gotham still needed him.

This is exactly why he gave Robin the Batcave. Also, notice the part where he restored the Batsignal. He knows Gotham still needs a protector, and he didn't leave it protector-less.

But is Robin really as good a protector as Batman?   I'm sorry I just can't accept Batman leaving Gotham

timdiggerm said:

 

And to go away with the Catwoman???  She is a criminal!  She set him up to get his ass beaten by Bane! She is partly responsible for all the death and destruction that he caused.   Also she is a thief, like the guy that murdered his parents!

No, there's more to her than that.

She set Batman up to get his ass kicked by Bane.   

Author
Time

Warbler said:

if he intends to do that, why'd he make it look like Batman is dead?   No,  it is clear that Bruce intends to give up Batman forever and that is not the Bruce Wayne we know and love.

I'm not even saying that Bruce, when choosing to fake his death, intends to return as Batman. Bruce intends to be done with it...but that doesn't mean that in a few years, he won't get that itch and come back. Nolan leaves the door open for either possibility.

it was clear in Begins that he is dead.

He was dead the same way Ra's al Ghul is ever dead. Yes, we last saw him a in fiery train crash. Does that mean that members of the League didn't extract his body and plop it into the nearest Lazarus pit? The fact that we never saw his corpse has left this open since Begins came out, and Ra's appearance in Rises only continues this.

nothing, my point is there is no way a Bruce would go away with a criminal,  especially one that set him up with Bane and is partly responsible for all the death and destruction he caused.

She set Batman up to get his ass kicked by Bane.

Like I said, she turned around, changed sides, redeemed herself, etc. It's character development.

But is Robin really as good a protector as Batman?

Bruce seems to think so, enough to restore the signal. Heck, given that he's not insane with grief and knows how to handle emotions, maybe he'll be better in some ways. Until the end of this film, Bruce is a deeply flawed guy with serious problems (see: 8 years as a recluse).

ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project

Author
Time

Warbler said:

timdiggerm said:

And the brings us to the thing I hate most about this movie.    Bruce Wayne leaving Gotham with Catwoman.   That is so wrong on so many fronts.   Bruce Wayne would never stop fighting crime in Gotham, you'd have to kill him or disable him permanently to stop from crime fighting.

Remember what Alfred said, early in the film, about how he hoped that Bruce would find peace. Bruce being at the cafe means that that's happened.

Bruce would never give up fighting crime in Gotham, period end of sentence. 

I think you really need to disconnect from the comic books. This Bruce Wayne is a different character. In Batman Begins, the scene where Bruce explains Batman to Alfred when they're on the plane, he makes it very clear that Batman would be temporary - a symbol to inspire people. In The Dark Knight, he sees Harvey Dent as the man who could inherit his inspiration. He sees Dent, a true hero, as the real symbol Gotham needs. He makes it very clear that he is going to retire Batman. Then, of course, Dent goes mad, but at the end, he decides that Batman could take the fall so Dent could remain as the true heroic symbol of Gotham. Now, in The Dark Knight Rises, his plan has worked, and they've cleaned the streets. Bruce is no longer Batman, but he isn't really living. Alfred leaves because Bruce turns again to Batman when Bane comes around because he believes Bruce is looking for death. Now, fast-forward to the end of the film, Bruce has realized what Alfred said was right. He wasn't afraid of death, but he should have been. Bruce managed to save the day, but he's older now. If he keeps Batman up, he will die, and for what? It doesn't matter who's behind the mask - it's the symbol of Batman. So he retires, but he doesn't do it how he did before. No, now he decides to have a life beyond Batman, as Alfred wanted. To me, it's the perfect conclusion to THIS Bruce Wayne's character arc.

As for Catwoman, he knows there's more to her than a criminal. I'm paraphrasing here, but he says, after deducing that she isn't poor enough to steal, that "she must be mixed up with the wrong people." He also later says that she must want the clean slate as "a way to start fresh." He believes that she did time before, honestly regretted it, and is now only working for Daggett because she wants the clean slate so she can get rid of her record. The fact that she comes back to save him kind of proves that he was right.

As for leading him to Bane, if I remember correctly, she said she did it because he would have killed her otherwise, and really Bruce wanted to find and fight Bane. After he got ass-kicked, he realized that he really was just looking for death, and he couldn't really blame Selina because it was almost entirely his fault he was put in that situation.  

Author
Time

I'm disappointed Anchorhead thinks this is a movie that can wait til the home release, I usually really enjoy hearing his perspective on movies.

I saw it, and might have rebuttals for both Gaff and Warb at one point. I mostly agreed with Gaff, but I was a little less critical than he was.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

I thought it was a good movie. I'm assuming all of my problems have already been stated above. Not even close to The Dark Knight unfortunately.

Author
Time

bkev said:

I'm disappointed Anchorhead thinks this is a movie that can wait til the home release, I usually really enjoy hearing his perspective on movies.

I saw it, and might have rebuttals for both Gaff and Warb at one point. I mostly agreed with Gaff, but I was a little less critical than he was.

I can't wait to hear your thoughts, kev.  I can't wring enough discussion out of this film!

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

bkev said:

I'm disappointed Anchorhead thinks this is a movie that can wait til the home release, I usually really enjoy hearing his perspective on movies.

I work a schedule called a 9\80 - every other Friday off.  Pretty common these days in corporate.  It allows me some nice movie\shopping\whatever time when those types of places are less crowded. 

I have a Batman\007 nerd buddy who went to see it opening night.  He didn't offer up an opinion or any spoilers because he'll probably want me to go see it with him on one of 9\80 days.  If I do that, you guys know I'll be right on here with a review.

In the interest of disclosure; I've perused a few spoilers because I don't have an emotional interest in this film. Villain\Catwoman\Robin\ the endless will he or wont he retire\etc\etc\etc.  I still might go, but I'm going in tainted.  Might be pleasantly surprised, might be just what I expected (too much of everything).  Either way, I'll give an honest opinion if I go.

Now - we get a Skyfall thread going and I'm all over it.  That's a franchise I've been very involved in for 40 years. Uber-nerd comes to mind.  I've been a Batman nerd for even longer, but Batman is such a contaminated entity that I've reduced it down to only what interests me and let the rest go or ignored it outright, much the same way I have Star Wars.

 

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

I think Anchorhead is really a bee themed superhero and that is the real reason for not having enough time to go to the movies.

Author
Time

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

After considering things, maybe I was a bit harsh on the idea of Bruce Wayne retiring.   He did indeed talk about stopping during the Dark Knight due to Harvey Dent. 

Anchorhead said:

bkev said:

I'm disappointed Anchorhead thinks this is a movie that can wait til the home release, I usually really enjoy hearing his perspective on movies.

I work a schedule called a 9\80 - every other Friday off.  Pretty common these days in corporate.  It allows me some nice movie\shopping\whatever time when those types of places are less crowded. 

I have a Batman\007 nerd buddy who went to see it opening night.  He didn't offer up an opinion or any spoilers because he'll probably want me to go see it with him on one of 9\80 days.  If I do that, you guys know I'll be right on here with a review.

In the interest of disclosure; I've perused a few spoilers because I don't have an emotional interest in this film. Villain\Catwoman\Robin\ the endless will he or wont he retire\etc\etc\etc.  I still might go, but I'm going in tainted.  Might be pleasantly surprised, might be just what I expected (too much of everything).  Either way, I'll give an honest opinion if I go.

Now - we get a Skyfall thread going and I'm all over it.  That's a franchise I've been very involved in for 40 years. Uber-nerd comes to mind.  I've been a Batman nerd for even longer, but Batman is such a contaminated entity that I've reduced it down to only what interests me and let the rest go or ignored it outright, much the same way I have Star Wars.

 

you think Batman is contaminated?   why?

to me, the Bond movies are contaminated.   To me, Bond was tragically  killed somewhere between the events of The Living Daylights and License To Kill. 

Author
Time

what does that article have to do with American judges?    As for the idea, I think it unwise.     It could be traumatic for this kids to see someone dressed as the Batman they saw on the screen as they were getting shot.    I wouldn't be surprised if many of the people in the theater never watch "The Dark Knight Rises" ever again.     I also must criticize another comment on the page.  Someone there claimed that Bale's Batman may have encouraged the shooter.   If that person knew anything about Batman, they'd know he abhors guns and criminals.  Batman(if he were real) would would have throttled that shooter   had he been in the theater.   Just how could a masked vigilante that goes out and fights crime and refuses to use guns and refuses to kill, encourage someone to open fire on a crowded movie theater?

Author
Time

^Well, the Golden Age Batman didn't have a problem with using guns; not at first, anyway.

Author
Time

perhaps, but we are not talking about the Golden Age Batman, we are talking about Bale's Batman.   Bale's Batman does not use guns.

Author
Time

Does anyone else here agree with me that it would have made more sense for John Blake's real name to  be Terry McGinnis  instead of Robin? 

Author
Time

Warbler said:

Does anyone else here agree with me that it would have made more sense for John Blake's real name to  be Terry McGinnis  instead of Robin? 

Yes. I believe they didn't use it because most people would kind of go "what? who?" By having his name be Robin it makes it clear to the majority of the audience that he will follow Batman. I actually wished he was referred to as Terry McGinnis throughout the film (I love Batman Beyond) but it would have given everything away. Shame. 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

Does anyone else here agree with me that it would have made more sense for John Blake's real name to  be Terry McGinnis  instead of Robin? 

Yes. I believe they didn't use it because most people would kind of go "what? who?"

you telling me that most of an audience that would watch a Batman movie, wouldn't know who Terry McGinnis is? 

Author
Time

Warbler said:

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

Does anyone else here agree with me that it would have made more sense for John Blake's real name to  be Terry McGinnis  instead of Robin? 

Yes. I believe they didn't use it because most people would kind of go "what? who?"

you telling me that most of an audience that would watch a Batman movie, wouldn't know who Terry McGinnis is? 

Well, yeah. First off, TMcG (as I'll call him) is a fairly new creation. Robin's been around for 73 years. Also, I'd wager to bet that at least 20% of the people who are going to see the movie are not really Batman fans (just fans of TDK or some other reason). Then it's important to note that probably at least another 30-50% are just casual Batman fans. Then you have to account for people like my brother, who was actually a fan of Batman Beyond back in the day, but couldn't for the life of him remember the name TMcG. So, yeah.