logo Sign In

Post #584305

Author
lurker77
Parent topic
Making our own 35mm preservation--my crazy proposal
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/584305/action/topic#584305
Date created
6-Jul-2012, 1:59 AM

^ That article explains perfectly what I was concerned about when I heard these guys were using an off-the-shelf digital camera instead of a professional scanner.

Bayer filter chips use fancy algorithms to cheat on image resolution, leading to colour inaccuracy. It's not horrible, but it's not the real thing.

Top-of-the-line film scanners use three sensors, one for each color. No cheating, full accuracy. But they cost millions of dollars, thanks not only to the extra sensors, but elaborate film gates, precise alignment of the sensors, an elaborate prism to split the colours between the sensors, and most of all, insanely good build quality.

The next best thing that can be done is something that the article touches on - oversampling. Simply, if you use a 12 megapixel digital camera to capture a 4K image, it will turn out almost as good as a 3-chip scanner. Today's DSLRs do 12 megapixels.

 

EDIT: My mistake. 12 megapixels is not the same thing as 12,000 pixels per line. That would be 48 megapixels, beyond what any off-the-shelf camera can do ATM.