Moth3r said:
Brooks said:
... (Vimeo smoothes it out a bit when streaming, at least on my computer/connection, so you can't really see the interlacing which is quite prevalent)
...
After thousands of man hours and millions of dollars spent, the scientists at Brooks laboratories have tweaked the footage in Premiere to downplay the interlacing, tone down the reddish tone and sharpen things a bit. They also used neat video to remove some of the noise.
Alarm bells ringing!
The scientists at Brooks laboratories don't seem to understand certain video basics, such as the difference between interlaced video and video telecined with 3:2 pulldown.
I had an almost identical conversation with another new member just a couple of weeks ago:
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-SWOLT-ANHV8-Preservation-Project/post/580980/#TopicPost580980Your sample plays with no audio, however the vimeo link plays with a choppiness that suggests you have not carried out an IVTC.
I think the problem for n00bs (such as myself) is that the word interlace seems to fit our perception of telecined material better than any other. I encounter similar problems with people new to programming all the time; e.g., the difference between a recursive procedure and a recursive process.