bkev said:

I still think ABC deserves the banhammer. But Warbler's reaction is no better and I can see why he previously had a ban himself.

Jesus... walkingdork is right. I'm just never going to bother with a thread that ABC, Warb, or possibly anybody not named TV's Frink posts in.

I don't really blame Warbler. I'm not sure if you saw the edits to the first post, constantly trying more ways to antagonize Warbler. I thought Frink had it perfectly right in his first post in this thread (when the title was pointlessly and stupidly aimed at Warbler): "Terrible thread idea and you know it, ABC."

I thought the thread would just die.

And I agree Warbler just needs to ignore this stuff. On the other hand, he doesn't want people constantly mocking him. It's just really uncalled for. Maybe if he ignored such people, they would stop mocking him - and that just shows how immature and abusive such people are being, they do it in order to upset him.

And I agree with everything CP3S has said here. You do stir the pot, walkingdork. Harassment of another member deserves no defense.

Obviously the powers that be decide when a ban is merited. I feel a ban is a good idea when a member drags down us down into this and breeds hostility. This is markedly different from poking fun. Most of us recognize the difference.