logo Sign In

Post #568612

Author
Mrebo
Parent topic
Did the prequels have boring visuals?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/568612/action/topic#568612
Date created
6-Mar-2012, 4:01 PM

TheBoost said:

This is less about how the visuals were achieved, but about the lack of passion put into them.

Think of how awesome the following should have looked

  • A guy fighting with two lightsabers at once.
  • A lightsaber duel in the dark.
  • A guy fighting a four-armed monster each arm wielding a lightsaber.

 

The lightsabers in the dark I fantasized about in the 80s. When I was in middle-school I made an art project called "Jedi Fighting In a Cave" with a piece of black construction paper, whiteout, and highlighter pens.

Yet all three ammount to nothing. Nothing memorable or exciting. They all last for less than ten seconds.

I think the commentary on the ROTS DVD said that they couldn't figure out how to do a four-armed sword fight, resulting in Grievous losing two arms in 9 seconds.

Ray Harryhausen did in with STOP MOTION in 1973!!!

What should have been these extremely fun and visual fights almost result in just a throwaway joke.

Very much this. As a film maker, one would think, "how can I present this idea in the most exciting and impactful way?" The framing, the backdrop, all of it. I don't feel that in the PT. It is a series of places filled with things. Places and things that took great creativity and effort but were not meant to showcase any particular visual element nor move the story forward.