darth_ender said:
...this is coming from the guy who has yet to acknowledge the amount of work I've put into answering his thoughtless questions. You didn't even say, "Thanks for an answer." You didn't even say, "I see you at least made an effort." You've instead chosen to dwell on my joking sarcasm and "grumpy grump" comment. I'm the only one who has addressed the issue at all!
Oh for Pete's sake... I told you you didn't need to bother wasting time on more of a reply. I would have rather you didn't, rather than do begrudgingly so as you did. Having a busy life myself, I get how valuable an hour can be.
I do appreciate the effort, I read it all very carefully. I also want to say I read all your links when you first posted them, since you seem to be under the impression I didn't, for some reason. Reading about the history of the gold plates and the witnesses for over an hour last night, I had several other questions I felt like posing, but you are so worked up about things, I really don't see a point, and you've mentioned several times you feel my arguments are "thoughtless" (if true, perhaps because it takes some heavy thinking to believe in something extremely unlikely, but takes no thought to dismiss it), which makes the effort feel even less worthwhile.
darth_ender said:
Until you take the time to read posts thoroughly and possibly put a little of your own effort into this discussion, until you stop taking every joke as a personal assault or a weak-minded defense...
You're being shockingly childish. Take a second to unbunch your white underwear. I read all your posts thoroughly, what makes you think I didn't? Taking every joke as a personal assault? They're not personal assaults, nor did I take them as such, but how exactly is accusing someone of being "overly sensitive" or complaining about them being "irritable" suppose to be taken as a joke?