Tobar said:
Huh, they actually responded. It starts at 1:41. I do regret leaving in that breakdown, I liked how the letter flowed better when I left it out when I posted it on their facebook page. I actually got a very positive response from others on their facebook page as well.
That was such a load of garbage they offered in response. Do these guys work for LFL? I've never listened to them and don't know their usual bent.
They say they didn't intend to lump haters into the same category as fan editors, even while endorsing the conflation of the two in the article. They even paraphrase the first sentence of the paragraph of the article that did paint fan editors as vitriolic haters.
They then go on to speak for Lucas (which is why I ask if they work for LFL), saying he is offended by fan edits and views them as an "abomination" and "bastardization of his work". They continue - after putting those words in GL's mouth that they are not taking any position on the rightness/wrongness of fan edits.
But GL never said any such things! GL has not pursued his legal rights against fan editors (despite being offended by bastardized abominations) and he has expressed support at least those fans who make their own films based in his universe. Correct me if I am wrong but isn't there a story that he has even seen Ady's Revisited and that he was not offended? In any event, GL was not saying all those things about fan edited films in the NYT article. GL was saying that if fans who hate him can rework his films, why can't they accept that he can also?
But of course that's not the issue and so these guys remain clueless. They put words into GL's mouth and pretend they hold no view whatsoever on fan edits. It was entirely disingenuous.