logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 126

Author
Time

Peep World - 2/10

The Lincoln Lawyer - 9/10

Since they're like poetry, what with the rhyming and all, I find that I only need to watch three out of the six films.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Best Worst Movie


A documentary about the cult classic that is Troll 2. It seems to me like this film ruined a lot of people's careers, and some of them appear to have went insane (such as the general store owner and the mother).

I also feel bad for the director, who was just now realizing that nobody really took his movie seriously. This becomes even more evident as the documentary goes on, in fact, he even seems to be on the verge of tears at one point. He sincerely believed that the film was good. I wonder about people like him, who will only be remembered in history as "the guy who made that really shitty movie".

George Hardy seems like a genuinely nice guy, and the only one who doesn't seem to have had his life ruined by this film. Very down-to-earth, very easy to relate to.

Overall, I give it a 9/10, just for showing what happens to people who end up making movies like this.

 

Also, I started watching the first 15 minutes or so of the actual Troll 2. I'm on my way to perfecting the "finger glasses" dance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez7VFMNLJyc

 

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

Quest For Fire (1981).

Somehow this flew under my radar until tonight.

If you can put aside any Paleoanthropological pedantry you may bring to the table for the duration of the piece, it's a rather charming and human film and has much better dialogue than any of the PT films.

Slightly chewed balls.

One of my favs.

“It is only through interaction, through decision and choice, through confrontation, physical or mental, that the Force can grow within you.”
-Kreia, Jedi Master and Sith Lord

Author
Time

captainsolo said:

I did all the Hammer Draculas...finally seeing all of them in consecutive order. WHY DO I DO THIS TO MYSELF??

The Brides of Dracula-No Dracula, odd vampire substitute but is still classic Hammer. Peter Cushing is brilliant but doesn't return until the last three sadly. 3 vampire bites seared by a hot iron out of 4 rubber bats.

Dracula: Prince of Darkness-Lee returns for this very classy sequel that unfortunately is the first of the series to suffer from acute boredom. I saw this as  a kid and it certainly doesn't play as well now. Aside from Dracula getting resurrected, the only other memorable moment is the death scene (which really is great.) 2.5 icy balls out of 4.

Dracula Has Risen From the Grave-Change in directors made this one have a different feel-mostly in the visuals. The major overtone is religion so we have a priest, atheist, and Monsignor for Dracula to play with. Dracula goes on the first of his wonderfully boring "revenge" plots and people get knocked off one by one. 2 holy balls out of 4.

Taste the Blood of Dracula-Brilliant first act that was all psycholgical...and it all suddenly grids to a screeching halt to become yet another Dracula getting revenge movie. Then it also lifts untold amounts from Has Risen. And to add insult to injury the ending is confusing, stupid, and absolutely incomprehensible. 2 balls out of 4.

Scars of Dracula-intended as a reboot for the series. Essentially a whole new Drac film, but all of the budget and interest has gone completely. This is really terrible. Terrible rubber bats, a scene where Dracula randomly stabs the living hell out of a girl vampire for NO APPARENT REASON!, the most gore of any Hammer film, more cardboard stock characters that are even worse this time around, and a stupid death for the Count. At least the first 10 minutes are ok. Dracula is resurrected, girl found dead with marks in neck, villagers storm castle and burn it down, and they return to their homes to find all of the women and children slaughtered. But afterwards it's terrible. Even Lee isn't any good. And when he is awful you know it's BAD. 1 gory ball out of 4.

Dracula A.D. 1972-The one I swore I'd never watch again. It's Dracula for a few minutes and he is killed as always. Then he arises again in 1972 with yet another revenge plot! (cue funky Blaxploitation music.) Awful, but at least there is a plot and budget. Peter Cushing returns and is the only reason to watch this terrible mess. 1 groovy ball out of 4.

The Satanic Rites of Dracula-I'd never seen this one before and had wondered why it had lapsed into the public domain. Somehow this is simultaneously better and worse than A.D. 1972. Part espionage movie, part cultists movie, part Dracula movie. The budget looks to have been two sticks of used chewing gum. Truly god-awful yet it has an ingeniously clever and diabolical plot. (Drac reinvents himself as a Howard Hughes type reclusive millionaire and recruits top government officials to aid his scheme of releasing a new deadly strain of plague that will decimate all populations. He does this because he wants to die and take the whole world with him.) Once again, only Peter rescues this dreadful mess. And Dracula gets hurt by a tree. No, I'm not kidding. 1 satanic ball out of 4.

Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires-the last of the cycle, a co-production with the Shaw Brothers. That's right, Kung-fu vampires! But even without Dracula and being so obviously bad, it works much better than the three previous films. Good ridiculous fun. Cushing is again a joy. 1.5 kung-fu balls out of 4.

And for some odd reason, I started writing reviews of these on my blog...

I think all the Hammer Dracula films are quite terrible. In fact, there were no good Dracula films between 1922 and 1977.

“It is only through interaction, through decision and choice, through confrontation, physical or mental, that the Force can grow within you.”
-Kreia, Jedi Master and Sith Lord

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

Long title, I know.

First off, I just want to say that I'm a huge Jesse James fan. I've visted his various homes he's lived in, one of the banks he robbed on Liberty MO, his grave, hell, I even have a Jesse James t-shirt!

When I went in, I immediately thought to myself "well, this is Hollywood, so I can't be expecting anything too accurate," as I began watching.

I was wrong.

Sure, there were some things that weren't perfect (like the fact that MO isn't a bunch of rolling flat land and prairie) but I could live with it. I was shocked to find how amazing this movie was. It had this artistic flare that I was not expecting, which was nice. The cinematography was beautiful, on a Days of Heaven type of level.

The casting was perfect. I thought that the fact that Brad Pitt was in it was going to bother me because he's so well known. He completely embodied the character so well that he convinced me that he was Jesse James. And of course, we have Sam Rockwell, who can't not be amazing.

Casey Affleck was the real scene-stealer however. He added so much depth and pity towards a person who is usually looked at as a villian. The filmmakers really got into his head, showed that he didn't know what he was getting himself into until it was too late.

One thing I noticed while I was watching this was that I kept switching sides between the two main characters. At the end, however, I realized that both characters were at fault and left it at that.

Overall, amazing film, not perfect, but damn near close to it.

8/10

Author
Time

Both Troll 2 and Best Worst Movie are awesome.

Author
Time

The Guardian--familiar plot, but told quite well.  I really thought Costner performed his role perfectly and Kutcher did a surprisingly good job as Maverick of the 2000s (except he actually learns some humility and teamwork later in the story).  I really enjoyed this film.

Never Been Kissed--I'm a guy willing to watch a chick flick any time my wife asks, and I like quite a few.  This is not one of them.  It's embarrassing moments were humorous, but most of the movie was painful, preachy, typical teen movie crap.  The worst part was knowing her teacher found her attractive though she was his supposedly 17 year old student.  That was certainly AWKward.  Terrible movie.

Author
Time

The Muppets

Not as awesome as it could be, but a good resurrection of a worthy franchise.

4/5 puppets

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

We watched Gattaca at uni yesterday. I was the only one in my class that had seen it before (but I am a bit more film savvy than my fellow students, who are morons.)

 

Man, I love this movie. I must've seen it over a gazillion times.

 

When we talked about the film afterwards, I was the only one to point out that practically all the shots were of the actors eye levels, whilst the other students just had a dumb look on their faces.

You can tell some of the students at uni are dumb when I seem to be the smartest one in the room.

 

 

..

 

But yeah enough bitching, Gattaca's awesome.

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time
 (Edited)

In a Better World (Hævnen) - Swedish/Danish flick. Very good.

The Thing (2011) - not as bad as people said, but mostly a retread prequel to the amazing 1982 flick. Decent.

“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”

Author
Time

Paranormal Activity. It's like The Blair Witch Project if The Blair Witch Project had taken place in a bland-looking modern home, with mediocre actors, and no interesting visuals. I give it a very boring 5/10.

Author
Time

theprequelsrule said:

I think all the Hammer Dracula films are quite terrible. In fact, there were no good Dracula films between 1922 and 1977.

The later ones are really bad. Brides and Prince of Darkness are okay. Has Risen and Taste the blood have a few good elements but these are far outweighed by the bad. I think there are really only three Dracula films ever worth mentioning: the '31 Lugosi film, Nosferatu, and Horror of Dracula.

Here's everything since the Hammer Dracs: out of 4 stars

Dracula (1931) **** Problem riddled, but still classic. Watch with the sound turned way up for a different experience.

Dracula (Spanish version 1931) *** after hearing for years that this was the superior film, I finally sat down and watched through it. Technically it is superior, and some of the actors are a bit more vivid. But it is actually inferior to the English version because it lacks any charm. The Spanish Count Dracula is laughable. Running 20 minutes longer than its counterpart it becomes even tedious.

The Mummy (1932) **** Dracula in Egypt. Unforgettable.

The Mummy’s Hand **1/2 Enjoyable B-serial that features a Mummy.

The Mummy’s Tomb ** The Mummy goes to New England.

The Mummy’s Ghost *1/2

The Mummy’s Curse * Godawful. Incoherent. Mess. Gets one star only for the resurrection of the Princess from the swamps.

The Invisible Man **** A masterpiece of whimsical fantasy.

The Invisible Man Returns *** Vincent Price is the Invisible Man. Enough said.

Frankenstein **** Grows the Universal sound horror by leaps and bounds.

Bride of Frankenstein **** The greatest horror film of all time.

Son of Frankenstein **** Underrated classic.

The Ghost of Frankenstein ** Stupid.

The Old Dark House (1932) **** Another timeless Whale gem.

Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein **1/2 The final nail in the coffin for the monsters.

Submarine ** Silly pointless quasi-indie British film from Redbox. Don't you love family selections?

Mystery of the Wax Museum **1/2 A snappier version of House of Wax that has such a haunting use of two-strip Technicolor. Superior in every way to the remake. Fun.

House of Wax **1/2 Other than Vincent Price this is a highly forgettable piece of 50's schlock. Low budget, rushed shooting schedule and a 3D film made by a director who couldn't see it.

The Mad Magician **1/2 A better version of HoW with Price as a magician in 3D B&W. Out of print but available online.

House of Usher *** The first of the Corman Poes is a bit stagey but effective.

The Pit and the Pendulum ***1/2 Diverging from straight Poe adaptation gives this story new life. Delicious.

The Premature Burial **1/2 Ray Milland steps in for Price well, but the film is rather asleep at the wheel.

Tales of Terror **1/2  3 Poes in one leaves each feeling rather unfulfilled. The Black Cat is the only worthwhile segment. Humorous Price vs. Peter Lorre.

The Haunted Palace ** Cheesy, ineffective story from Lovecraft dressed to seem like another Poe film. Silly, but the Price performance is great as always.

The Masque of the Red Death ***1/2 The best of the Poes, shot by Nic Roeg in England on a greater budget and schedule.

The Tomb of Ligeia *** The most intricate Poe film, but lacks in dramatic punch by the end.

Crossplot *** Essentially like an extended episode of The Saint. ;)

Dr. No (Connery Collection LD) **** print sourced with cue marks visible.

From Russia With Love (Connery Collection LD)**** this edition is directly print sourced with lots of noise (hiss, pops, crackle, reel changes)  on the soundtrack.

Goldfinger (Connery Collection LD-from a print!!!)**** print sourced.

Thunderball (1989 LD with British mono)**** Has the British mono with different dialogue and alternate Thunderball end title music.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time
 (Edited)

captainsolo said:

I think there are really only three Dracula films ever worth mentioning: the '31 Lugosi film, Nosferatu, and Horror of Dracula.

To that list I would add Vampyr (1932), Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979), and Shadow of the Vampire (2000). And maybe Dracula (1979) - the one with Frank Langella, just for the creepy scene in the sewer.

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time

Days of Heaven 9/10

A great, beautiful film. Though, whenever I watch a Terrence Malick film, I find myself wondering "What was the point of that?"

Author
Time
 (Edited)

DominicCobb said:

Days of Heaven 9/10

A great, beautiful film. Though, whenever I watch a Terrence Malick film, I find myself wondering "What was the point of that?"

I'm not sure what you mean. What's the point of most films? To witness some moments in the lives of interesting characters. To feel transported to another time or place.

At the risk of sounding overly poetic, the point is to see a romance blossom and come to ruin, and to follow a young girl as she experiences and comments on what it is to be an itinerant laborer during the Great Depression. What more of a point should there be than that?

Author
Time

Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

captainsolo said:

I think there are really only three Dracula films ever worth mentioning: the '31 Lugosi film, Nosferatu, and Horror of Dracula.

To that list I would add Vampyr (1932), Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979), and Shadow of the Vampire (2000). And maybe Dracula (1979) - the one with Frank Langella, just for the creepy scene in the sewer.

Langella's performance is quite interesting - very different than any other. He is just so damn charming and cheerful.

The best version of Dracula is the 1977 BBC miniseries. The Lugosi film has become iconic but I have always found it quite terrible. Unfortunately Lugosi's ridiculous performance became associated with the character.

Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) was pretty good, although not great (Keanu Reeves as Harker? WTF?). It was very, very sexy. Winona Rider and Monica Bellucci kissing other girls!

“It is only through interaction, through decision and choice, through confrontation, physical or mental, that the Force can grow within you.”
-Kreia, Jedi Master and Sith Lord

Author
Time

asterisk8 said:

DominicCobb said:

Days of Heaven 9/10

A great, beautiful film. Though, whenever I watch a Terrence Malick film, I find myself wondering "What was the point of that?"

I'm not sure what you mean. What's the point of most films? To witness some moments in the lives of interesting characters. To feel transported to another time or place.

At the risk of sounding overly poetic, the point is to see a romance blossom and come to ruin, and to follow a young girl as she experiences and comments on what it is to be an itinerant laborer during the Great Depression. What more of a point should there be than that?

Yes, I know that. I didn't really put it the right way. I'm just saying that whenever I finish one of his films I find myself asking that question. Usually when I watch the movie I find myself asking that question during the film, but with Malick, its after. It might be a compliment actually. Anyways, I gave it a 9 didn't I? For me that means it was pretty damn good.

Author
Time

The people vs George Lucas - I found it to be quite disappointing. Despite good reviews I found it to be quite boring in places, maybe I just don't connect with a lot of these people.

A lot of stuff isn't really explained as well as it could be either. It just feels like a bit of a jumbled mess sometimes - like flicking channels or something.

For a Documentary about GL, they spend very little time with people who personally know the man or worked with him - people with genuine insight.

in the end there are some good points brought up but some of them are dismissed far too quickly and others linger for far too long. 

there were two points that i thought were interesting and both of them show the worst of Star Wars fandom. Not really the angle you want when you're trying to portray the other side as the 'bad guy'.

1 ) Adywan mentions fan reactions to Revisited and receiving death threats [for attempting to undo the horrible changes that the fans hate] and then it just cheerfully cuts away to something else. 

That example of fan attitude could fill out a documentary of its own.

2 ) The hype leading up to TPM and fan excitement. Some fans when asked even refused to except the possibility that it might suck. The closed mindedness of some of them is almost depressing.

 

 

 

 

Author
Time

Exit Through the Gift Shop

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0b90YppquE

This is one of those movies which are kinda hard to describe to people because it doesn't do it any justice.

I'm a sucker for really "fun" documentaries. I love watching things such as Super Size Me and Thank You for Smoking. If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you clearly haven't seen those other two films.

The film focuses on Street Artists, notably Banksy, who also directed the film. Below you can see a couple pieces of his work.

I liked this film a lot, and it made me a lot more aware that street art can actually be quite political and intelligent, rather then nothing more than gang symbols and promotion of violence.

This film raises another very important question. What separates graffiti from art? Please reply with your opinion. (I'm looking at you, ender.)