It's just that, temporary. Try again later. And try refreshing the MU page a few times.
Cobra Kai said:
My only question would be that the subtitles might look a little too bold, from what i remember of the original?
You need to make yourself more clear. Do you mean the subs in the video or on the picture? The subs in the video aren't final - they were so bold because I tried to simulate the subs in Puggo Grande but then I found some different sources, which I think are very reliable (one of which is the Baltimore screening video but mainly Mike Verta's picture, which I think can be deemed 100% reliable) which seem to point towards a slightly thinner, more rounded font (it's probably the same font in Puggo's but the overblown whites make it look thicker) hence Yoo_Too's adjustment of my subs, which makes it look almost perfectly like the original subs and that's what's in the last picture I posted :-)
I dont know, i dont currently have the gout on my computer to compare.
The GOUT wouldn't help you determine the right look of the subs, because it uses ugly selectable DVD subs, which make no attempt at simulating the original theatrical subs.
joshdv said:
the greedo subs originally did sort of a morphing effect? Cool. Was that not present in the gout? I don't recall seeing it in that transfer. Was this on the 35mm print?
If you're talking about the fade in/out with a blur thing, all evidence seems to point toward no such thing ever being there in SW, so I'll probably take it out. I just thought it looked pretty cool. I've seen countless subtitled films theatrically and I remember this effect being there but as it seems it wasn't there in this case, and since we're getting closer and closer to the actual theatrical subs, I think I'll take it out.
You may also have noticed that I cut back on the shake in the last two videos - it's still there but not as much.