TServo2049 said:

I tell you, this detail-recovery thing looks amazing, and I get how it basically works. In a stationary shot like this every frame of a print has a different part of the negative detail in it, and he's taking all that detail and combining it back together.

Pardon me if I sound like a sycophant, I'm not, I'm just amazed by what he's doing and I support it.

You know, since he's not sharing the results of his work with us, he could at least share the tools to help other people involved in restoration projects, since they apparently work so well. However, he doesn't even do that. And that's what annoys me the most in his attitude so far.