This thread is a really, really bad idea...
Having said that... I've always wanted to ask a Mormon to explain why The Book of Abraham is still considered cannon now that our knowledge of the Egyptian language has grown to the point that real Egyptologist scholars have been able to take a look at the Joseph Smith Papyri and discovered that they don't contain anything that Joseph Smith claims to have translated from them? If the missing source for The Book of Mormon (that was only ever confirmed to exist by a very small number of men with a common agenda) doesn't smell fishy in the slightest, doesn't this whole situation with the JS Papyri turning out to just be fragments of ancient Egyptian funeral texts at least have a slightly pungent odor to it?
You're not the only LDS on these forums, and I rather like the other ones I know of here; I don't mean any disrespect to anyone, and really have no intention of stepping on toes. However, I think these are very reasonable questions and fair questions I am posing.