The character's name was "Charlie", I'm sure that he did that so he could do whatever he wanted with the character, or do a "spiritual sequel" of sorts.TV's Frink said:
Anyway, why would that prevent him from taking the character elsewhere? And wouldn't trademark laws (or whatever the equivalent is) be much more relevant?
Post #543698
- Author
- doubleofive
- Parent topic
- Last web series/tv show seen
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/543698/action/topic#543698
- Date created
- 5-Oct-2011, 3:43 PM