Coupla thoughts (apologies if I missed these being mentioned already):

The shot is an optical. The "camera shake" is fake. It is possible the orange errors were introduced when creating the shake, and, perhaps, the shake was redone at a later date...perhaps after discovering an IP/N they were using was sans optical. (?) This kind of effect would likely be done at the same time as wipes and fades--by chance have we ever come across any redone wipes or fades prior to the SE that might suggest a time that the shake could've been redone as well? In any event, this would've been redone along with all the wipes and fades for the SE, which explains framing inconsistencies.

The errors are not a negative tear...or at least, not a single one. A single tear would be at the bottom of one frame and at the top of the next. These errors are inconsistent with that. They are two separate errors on subsequent frames.