I'd like to say this at the neoGAF forum:

Hello there. I'm happy to see that people outside of the OT.com forum are enjoying my edits :-)

Now, I know they're not quite as good a quality as the Blu-Rays but I think they definitely don't look bad compared to them (in reaction to this post: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=30857446&postcount=189 ):

"I like what he's doing but the quality still looks bad compared to this:"

Here's the same shot from DeEd upscaled to the same resolution for comparison:

There is of course more compression (which in this case is more prominent and noticeable in a still picture) but in terms of detail, there isn't really much of a difference, so I'd agree that it looks less good than the BD but I wouldn't say it looks bad compared to it.

And if a different picture was chosen, like those in post 240, there would probably be almost no difference at all (except that mine would have better colour ;-D ).

Also Ady's purist edit should be pointed out to those who complain about the music additions and stuff.