
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I hope it is the case. That will be amazing! Hopefully directors are finally getting the point that nobody really wants out of place modern day tinkering in their older films.
Eric Goldman of IGN on Twitter said:
Spielberg just asked us if we would be upset if the ET Blu-ray only had the 1982 version. After our loud "No!", he said, "So be it!"
A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em
I hope it is the case. That will be amazing! Hopefully directors are finally getting the point that nobody really wants out of place modern day tinkering in their older films.
I have to say I didn't mind the added Halloween scene where the mom picks up Elliot's siblings, but all of the CG enhancements were pretty atrocious.
A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em
bkev said:I don't know how to link to specific tweets
EricIGN tweeted:
http://twitter.com/#!/EricIGN/status/113470522251157504
"that's a little bit of a hot topic, isn't it?" - Spielberg asked about changing his movies
EricIGN tweeted:
http://twitter.com/#!/EricIGN/status/113470615570227200
"I tried it once and I learned to regret it" - Spielberg on changing ET
EricIGN tweeted:
http://twitter.com/#!/EricIGN/status/113471497225510912
Spielberg just asked us if we would be upset if the ET Blu-ray only had the 1982 version. After our loud "No!", he said, "So be it!"
EricIGN tweeted:
http://twitter.com/#!/EricIGN/status/113472078866415616
Spielberg also said George Lucas is a great person, who gave us Star Wars and Indiana Jones and Star Wars is his to change if he wants
EricIGN tweeted:
http://twitter.com/#!/EricIGN/status/113472368638296064
End all be all: these two old friends (Spielberg/Lucas) have differing philosophies on changing their movies. I'd love to overhear debates!
http://twister111.tumblr.com
Previous Signature preservation link
Why not put both versions in it?
Did you not read the tweet above where he said:
"I tried it once and I learned to regret it" - Spielberg on changing ET
Isn't it his right to NOT include a SE?
I like the original better too but I think that once the SE is done, it should be released as well (and there were HD broadcasts of the SE, so they do have an HD master for it already, so no additional cost would be involved). The general opinion may be that people don't care for the SE, but I'm sure you could find someone who likes the SE and would like to have the option of seeing it in HD.
But it's definitely still more logical to release the original only than the SE only.
featuring the theatrical version is the way to go! *thumbs up*
it's important to feature the original sound mix of course. and foreign releases shall get their original sound mix as well. it's part of movie history.
TV's Frink said:
Did you not read the tweet above where he said:
"I tried it once and I learned to regret it" - Spielberg on changing ET
Isn't it his right to NOT include a SE?
Of course he is. But then again, so is Lucas in his right to not include the original. Personally, I would like to see both versions released.
I hope E.T.'s Blu release blows SW out of the water! I hope some would buy E.T. just to prove a point to Lucas... though I would buy it anyway.
Galatians 2: 20: I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
I've never seen the Special Edition. I never wanted to after being bored to death with the original version.
Alexrd said:
TV's Frink said:
Did you not read the tweet above where he said:
"I tried it once and I learned to regret it" - Spielberg on changing ET
Isn't it his right to NOT include a SE?
Of course he is. But then again, so is Lucas in his right to not include the original. Personally, I would like to see both versions released.
I'm one of six people who don't like ET, so I don't have a dog in this fight, but with all the space on the Blu-ray it would be cool to have both versions preserved, although perhaps Spielberg would rather try and put the genie back in the proverbial bottle if he truly regrets the SE.
I'd have no objection to him releasing both versions on blu ray. But if he is only going to release one, make it the original.
I don't care for E.T. either, but the fact that Spielberg resents doing the SE has to be good for something....;)
The bit that worries me is the "digital restoration" of Raiders. I wasn't a fan of the original Lowry cleanup and tweaks made at that point...so since the CGI cliff was rejected...what exactly did they do?
VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader
I didn't even know there was an SE of ET...
All I knew was that they censored a few bits because of 9-11.
But I'm another one of those six who didn't like the movie, so... (except for the first half-hour or so)
This signature uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:
The SE has a couple new scenes, enhanced effects in others, changes a piece of dialog about looking like a "terrorist" (changed to "hippie", I think) and replacing the guns of the federal agents with walkie-talkies.
I'm not an ET fan either, but that's a little much.
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress
Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress
Alexrd said:
TV's Frink said:
Did you not read the tweet above where he said:
"I tried it once and I learned to regret it" - Spielberg on changing ET
Isn't it his right to NOT include a SE?
Of course he is. But then again, so is Lucas in his right to not include the original. Personally, I would like to see both versions released.
A director withholding a previously released SE and a director withholding a theatrical version is not comparable.
TV's Frink said:
Alexrd said:
TV's Frink said:
Did you not read the tweet above where he said:
"I tried it once and I learned to regret it" - Spielberg on changing ET
Isn't it his right to NOT include a SE?
Of course he is. But then again, so is Lucas in his right to not include the original. Personally, I would like to see both versions released.
A director withholding a previously released SE and a director withholding a theatrical version is not comparable.
I don't know. Is it a question or ORIGINAL INTENT or is it a question of film history? The ET SE is still a piece (arguably a notable piece) of film history.
TheBoost said:
TV's Frink said:
Alexrd said:
TV's Frink said:
Did you not read the tweet above where he said:
"I tried it once and I learned to regret it" - Spielberg on changing ET
Isn't it his right to NOT include a SE?
Of course he is. But then again, so is Lucas in his right to not include the original. Personally, I would like to see both versions released.
A director withholding a previously released SE and a director withholding a theatrical version is not comparable.
I don't know. Is it a question or ORIGINAL INTENT or is it a question of film history? The ET SE is still a piece (arguably a notable piece) of film history.
This.
This is good news.
Not the SE not being included part, (which is fine with me) but that I just found out that E.T is getting a blu-ray release about a minute ago.
Ziggy Stardust said: Not the SE not being included part, (which is fine with me) but that I just found out that E.T is getting a blu-ray release about a minute ago.
I did too! It is great news that the theatrical cut is being released on BD.
Love the fact that he's just releasing the original, which I'm a big fan of (never saw the SE). I'll definitely be buying this one.
captainsolo said:
The bit that worries me is the "digital restoration" of Raiders. I wasn't a fan of the original Lowry cleanup and tweaks made at that point...so since the CGI cliff was rejected...what exactly did they do?
Raiders is being done by the same outfit that did Gladiator (the remaster, not the original), Saving Private Ryan, and Minority Report. All are stunning on Blu-ray.
I have very high hopes for Indiana Jones on Blu-ray, and unlike another upcoming release, I'll be buying the set on day one, whenever that is.
MTFBWY…A
Jay said:
captainsolo said:
The bit that worries me is the "digital restoration" of Raiders. I wasn't a fan of the original Lowry cleanup and tweaks made at that point...so since the CGI cliff was rejected...what exactly did they do?
Raiders is being done by the same outfit that did Gladiator (the remaster, not the original), Saving Private Ryan, and Minority Report. All are stunning on Blu-ray.
I have very high hopes for Indiana Jones on Blu-ray, and unlike another upcoming release, I'll be buying the set on day one, whenever that is.
I'll get Indiana Jones on Blu-Ray, too! The only thing that bugs me is the lack of the dust on the glass that was originally seen. Harmy? *bats eyelids pleadingly*
The franchises I get nerdy about are so obscure that not even most nerds know about them.
Oh wow E.T. on Blu-Ray! I'm glad Spielberg is using the theatrical cut. It ought to look fantastic especially for lovers of that movie. With luck, Jaws will come soon too; I know it's already in the works.
Jay said:
Raiders is being done by the same outfit that did Gladiator (the remaster, not the original), Saving Private Ryan, and Minority Report. All are stunning on Blu-ray.
I have very high hopes for Indiana Jones on Blu-ray, and unlike another upcoming release, I'll be buying the set on day one, whenever that is.
Out of curiosity, Jay, where did you find the information about Raiders being done by that outfit? In any case, that's fantastic news! Does that mean that the relatively new and unreleased-to-DVD transfer (which restored the non-CGI cliff) made for digital broadcast will not be used for the Blu-Ray? Whatever transfer used, theatrical versions of the Indy movies equals a first-day purchase for me. Hopefully, no wires (or reflections) are fixed, as promised.