logo Sign In

Star Wars coming to Blu Ray (UPDATE: August 30 2011, No! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!) — Page 260

Author
Time

retartedted wrote: Why the teal shift? 

GL's getting old. http://www.agingeye.net/visionbasics/theagingeye.php

Color vision and contrast sensitivity are also affected by aging. Color vision changes cause some reduction of ability to discriminate blues and blue-greens. The yellowing of the lens is believed to be responsible for this effect. The aging lens and cornea causes glare by light scattering, especially for shorter wavelengths. Stray light and lenticular fluorescence washes out contrast. (Reference: Work, Aging and Vision. National Academy Press; 1987). Contrast sensitivity shows a significant age-related decline (Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000;20:323-34). Wavefront aberrations of the cornea also increase with age, leading to poor vision quality especially when the pupil dilates as in the dark (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1351-5)

 

Author
Time

I like that they added voiceover of Shmi to Anakin's dream in AOTC so that it now finally sounds like a nightmare instead of a...well, you know.

Author
Time

The teal shift is probably not from aging. It's just a trend. They probably wanted to do a quick colour-pass to make it look "nicer" for Blu Ray, maybe pop the colours, get rid of any pink shift, etc. So in these cases it's usually up to the discretion of the colourist, and colourist sort of automatically go for the teal-and-orange look nowadays because the older pink-and-blue look is dated. If you saw the film on its own you'd probably hardly be aware it had been changed, other than something was different, it's the side-by-side where things seem more noticeable. TPM seems to have had a colour-pass too, but the colourist kept things more neutral--actually, he seems to have preferred a more "golden" cast overall. ROTS looks about the same to me, but maybe because it was the most recent.

Author
Time

none said:

GL's getting old. http://www.agingeye.net/visionbasics/theagingeye.php

Color vision and contrast sensitivity are also affected by aging. Color vision changes cause some reduction of ability to discriminate blues and blue-greens. The yellowing of the lens is believed to be responsible for this effect. The aging lens and cornea causes glare by light scattering, especially for shorter wavelengths. Stray light and lenticular fluorescence washes out contrast. (Reference: Work, Aging and Vision. National Academy Press; 1987). Contrast sensitivity shows a significant age-related decline (Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000;20:323-34). Wavefront aberrations of the cornea also increase with age, leading to poor vision quality especially when the pupil dilates as in the dark (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1351-5)

 Wow, that's almost as depressing as the rest of this thread.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Does anyone know if the shot in Episode I where Darth Maul's neck is unpainted when he is talking to Sidious has been fixed?

Author
Time

Ah, Freiheit, starring none other than the director of such classic films as Grease and Honey, I Blew Up the Kid!

Author
Time

Just a mini update:

  • SW4-6 blu rays don't have any easter eggs but plenty of Gigabyte free
  • ROTJ: During the Vader throws down Palpatine scene (which is critisized the most in this release) GL talks in the audio commentary about how you can read his emotions from the mask. It's such ironical.

 

Didn't have the interest to watch the prequels yet.

It will be interesting to see how the vintage documentaries will look as Adywan source said they do come from old VHS/Laserdisc masters from the 80's/90's. Interlaced SD content, not prepared to be viewed on progressive (HD) displays. Such effort definately deserves THX blu ray disc certificate *sarcastic*.

 

 

Author
Time

R2D2 said:


ROTJ: During the Vader throws down Palpatine scene (which is critisized the most in this release) GL talks in the audio commentary about how you can read his emotions from the mask. It's such ironical.
Ah, the beauty of using a commentary from 2004. Now there are official releases that have Lucas changing his mind on things as you watch!

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

R2D2 said:

Just a mini update:

  • SW4-6 blu rays don't have any easter eggs but plenty of Gigabyte free
  • ROTJ: During the Vader throws down Palpatine scene (which is critisized the most in this release) GL talks in the audio commentary about how you can read his emotions from the mask. It's such ironical.

 

Didn't have the interest to watch the prequels yet.

It will be interesting to see how the vintage documentaries will look as Adywan source said they do come from old VHS/Laserdisc masters from the 80's/90's. Interlaced SD content, not prepared to be viewed on progressive (HD) displays. Such effort definately deserves THX blu ray disc certificate *sarcastic*.

 

 

 

Oh, that's nothing.

Kenneth Branagh's four-hour, 65mm-shot Hamlet takes up like 35 gigs or something on its blu-ray.

The three-hour-each theatrical LOTRs take up barely 40 gigs each.

The two-and-a-half hour Goodfellas takes up less than 25.

For a two hour movie like Star Wars, 40 gigs is plenty.

Author
Time

The World War II analogies are wearing thin, and don't help our public image any.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

The World War II analogies are wearing thin, and don't help our public image any.

HaHaHa, does the public even care about our opinions?

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

SilverWook said:

The World War II analogies are wearing thin, and don't help our public image any.

HaHaHa, does the public even care about our opinions?

They might if we make rational factual arguments, and lay off the Nazi crap.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

^SilverWook he's not worth your time.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

generalfrevious said:

SilverWook said:

The World War II analogies are wearing thin, and don't help our public image any.

HaHaHa, does the public even care about our opinions?

They might if we make rational factual arguments, and lay off the Nazi crap.

This.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

generalfrevious said:

SilverWook said:

The World War II analogies are wearing thin, and don't help our public image any.

HaHaHa, does the public even care about our opinions?

They might if we make rational factual arguments, and lay off the Nazi crap.

I would agree that we're better off not making Hitler comparisons (despite what I consider to be a fascist approach by Mr Lucas) or that the fanbase has been "raped". 

What seems to be getting the most attention is Lucas's speech to Congress in the 80s, and the alleged comment made to a fan that went something like "Move on with your life...they're my movies, not yours." I think Mr Lucas and Lucasfilm in general is having a bit of a PR problem these days. And considering that he's got six movies that he intends to release theatrically (AGAIN) in 3D, it would be in his best interest to make nice. Ergo, release the OOT for those who want it.

That doesn't mean he will.

 

 

 

 

Author
Time

This site has a higher profile than when I first joined, and we've had an influx of new people. Outsiders do read what we post.

Puggo posted this in the preservation board a while back. Some nice positive stuff about us.

http://hd420p.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/star-wars-fan-edits-and-restorations/

The warm fuzzy feeling I get from that is diminished when I feel I have to stick up for this place over at the HTF...

http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/313950/chance-to-talk-to-lucasfilm-about-the-new-star-wars-blu-rays-what-do-you-want-to-know/870#post_3848203

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

 

JasonN said:



Bingowings said:

I take back everything I said about this new digi-Yoda.

In motion it's even crappier than the original puppet.

It really looks like CGI had moved backwards since 1999 in those sequences.

The shape is more Yodaish but it moves like they aren't paying the animator enough.


That first shot of that video seemed odd to me for some reason, like there was something a little "off" with Yoda in contrast to his later scenes of the video, so I went back and checked my dvd copy of TPM for reference.... and I was right:

They did not alter the original CG Yoda model in that first shot to match the new CG Yoda model of the later scenes. Lucas, you lazy fu........
-__-
Sure enough. I agree, while the digital model is certainly better than the strange puppet, the animation, lighting, texturing, they all seem to be a bit off. It looks like they didn't have a budget for these new changes, so they did them as fast as possible just to get it done. They honestly look like the effects done for a direct to DVD or TV release, which I guess these technically are...

 

That's my opinion exactly! ;)

http://images.fanedit.org/images/FE%3C3OT/fe-ot1_signature.png

The franchises I get nerdy about are so obscure that not even most nerds know about them.

Author
Time

bkev said:

^SilverWook he's not worth your time.

Not worth your time!? I'm the only person here who knows what is going on with the SW franchise, and how ultimately, GL will win in destroying the original films outside of fan preservations. Never will we get to see Han Solo shoot first, Sebastian Shaw's warm smile at the end of Jedi, and Vader's silent decision to save Luke in the quality these films deserve. Since it is inevitable that GL will win over us, he needs to be punished for the damage he has done to our cultural heritage. I ask you all again, what is the point? All you have ever succeeded in doing is make two petitions that failed, and substandard bootlegs that are still going to be behind the curve 20 years from now.

 

Author
Time

Oh Freivous you are such a dashing iconoclast. Someone has to rock the truth right? You're just like PUMP UP THE VOLUME.

 

 

 

Author
Time

You know, sometimes I think I prefer not having the OOT just to spite frevious.