Star Wars coming to Blu Ray (UPDATE: August 30 2011, No! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!) — Page 247

none said:

Making the rounds:

<img src="http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x177/NoHumorMan/Various%20Star%20Wars/yodas2.jpg" width="600" height="512" />

georgec said:

That's why you won't convince us to ever love the prequels.

I get the joke, but I have to ask (again) where did you got that idea from? When has he ever tried to convince anyone to love any of his movies?

How about adding stuff from movies I hate into movies I love?

none said:

Making the rounds:

My image dominates around the forums :P

-Angel

Harmy said:

How about adding stuff from movies I hate into movies I love?

Alexrd said:

georgec said:

That's why you won't convince us to ever love the prequels.

I get the joke, but I have to ask (again) where did you got that idea from? When has he ever tried to convince anyone to love any of his movies?

I've already answered this question previously despite your obstinate refusal to understand a clear, simple point. Other posters (Harmy, 005) have chimed in, too, so I won't repeat myself. Hopefully you can figure it out on your own.

The "original" trilogy blu-ray set still has 3 1/2 stars on Amazon.  Just saying......

I did it for both.

The Aluminum Falcon said:

LOL. It's good that the Blu-Ray set is having some negative publicity about the new changes, but I'm surprised LFL hasn't taken any action against the leaked copies...

On that matter, I am very surprised that no one has leaked the deleted scenes nor the TPM with a CGI Yoda. I wonder if LFL is really attempting to keep those ones under guard.

In one of their documentaries they had a CG yoda on dagobah (probably for matching the proportions (which they failed), they had him say "you are reckless" lines. No idea why they didnt think to add him in ESB and Jedi as CG. That would be a nice start for the 3D edition dont you think? ;)

-Angel

I never bought anything through Amazon, so it won't let me write reviews :-(

I wish that amazon showed how many people have pre-ordered a set that way we could watch the numbers and get an idea of what is actually going on.

georgec said:

Alexrd said:

georgec said:

That's why you won't convince us to ever love the prequels.

I get the joke, but I have to ask (again) where did you got that idea from? When has he ever tried to convince anyone to love any of his movies?

I've already answered this question previously despite your obstinate refusal to understand a clear, simple point. Other posters (Harmy, 005) have chimed in, too, so I won't repeat myself. Hopefully you can figure it out on your own.

How is adding assets to the trilogy an attempt to convince people to love/like the prequels? There is a difference between accepting the prequels as part of the saga, and convince people to love them. That's why I keep asking for a source from your assumtion, because that's what it is.

You don't think Lucas isn't depressed that so many people despise the movies he obviously thinks are perfect representations of what he wants Star Wars to be? I think he's taking it out on the originals that he will never be satisfied with. I'm surprised he's not trying to remake them in his image. The "real 4 5 & 6" that he has complete creative control over...

The Aluminum Falcon said:

doubleofive said:

The "real 4 5 & 6" that he has complete creative control over...

Actually, if he decided to leave the Original Trilogy alone and release them unaltered in great quality, I'd be fine if he makes remakes that are his "true vision." I might even see them for comical effect, just so long as the actual Original Unaltered Trilogy sits proudly on my shelf.

This.

Baronlando said:

Alexrd said:

How is adding assets to the trilogy an attempt to convince people to love/like the prequels? There is a difference between accepting the prequels as part of the saga, and convince people to love them. That's why I keep asking for a source from your assumtion, because that's what it is.

What are you, a star wars lawyer?

He's been stalking me and quoting my posts for a few days. It's probably best to ignore him, as it's clear he hasn't made an effort to understand a very simple point demonstrated by Lucas putting prequel content in the originals, focusing the movie names on "episode #" rather than main title, etc.

I could very well ask this guy to prove that George Lucas only wants people to accept the prequels as part of the saga instead of liking them as much as the originals. Could he prove it? Nope. Hopefully this poster stops spamming the thread with his redundant, illogical statements and petty squabbling over semantics.