What's with Roger Ebert and... sex... recently? — Page 2

Did he forget that movies are often cut down to (just barely) PG-13 to make more money?

He can also find plenty of boobs on the internet.  Hell, he can probably find pictures where he has boobs on the internet.

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

I'm done here.

Please let "here" be ot.com.

Seriously. Sick of his bullshit gumming up EVERY last topic. I think being a general public nuisance needs to be a ban-able offense. I am pretty sure Ziggy isn't the only one who has thought of leaving this place for a while in hopes that twooffour will get bored/a life/hit by a bus.

xhonzi said:

Which also leads me to this thought, which might be better suited for another thread (on another site, but I digress)... but does nudity/seeing a sex scene somehow make the relationship deeper or more intimate?  (In a movie.  I, of course, acknowledge the need for nudity in real relationships. :) )  I've always been perfectly satisfied with a little saxophone music telling me all I need to know.  It tells me what's happened to the characters individually and what's changed in their relationship.  I don't need to see any more than that.  Just like I don't need to see these people on the crapper.

Watchmen, I'm looking at you.  (for the explicit sex scenes, not the crapper scenes)

First of all, any movie starring C3PX could not have a crapper scene by definition. :-(

Now then...regarding your question...I thought I had a movie that absolutely needed more than the saxophone music...THE ROOM!!!

Granted, the saxophone music is awesome.  But the actual visuals are even more hilarious.

But then I remembered the TV cut which pretty much has giant black boxes over everything...and that was WAY funnier.

So never mind!

CP3S said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

I'm done here.

Please let "here" be ot.com.

Seriously. Sick of his bullshit gumming up EVERY last topic. I think being a general public nuisance needs to be a ban-able offense. I am pretty sure Ziggy isn't the only one who has thought of leaving this place for a while in hopes that twooffour will get bored/a life/hit by a bus.

But it is not his fault.  Remember, if the majority of people think something, there's no possible way it's true - they're just a victim of herd mentality.

xhonzi said:

those kind of comments were in 100% of his reviews I read?

It was in 5 of the 5 reviews that I read.

CP3S said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

I'm done here.

Please let "here" be ot.com.

Seriously. Sick of his bullshit gumming up EVERY last topic. I think being a general public nuisance needs to be a ban-able offense. I am pretty sure Ziggy isn't the only one who has thought of leaving this place for a while in hopes that twooffour will get bored/a life/hit by a bus.

Well, why don't you leave it, then?

Your constant whining and complaining cropping up whenever I post something, is actually way more annoying (and unjustified) than me stating my opinion on a given subject (as bluntly as it may get).
So how about we make personal harassment and thread derailment for no reason whatsoever a bannable offense first? We can always add the "getting on someone's precious nerves" afterwards, can't we.

So, yea, why don't you leave for while and reflect on your giant gaping hypocrisies? It's embarassing to read.
For those too thick to get it - this is just another instance where I'm not the one starting to post off-topic personal bullshit in someone's thread ;)

TV's Frink said:

But it is not his fault.  Remember, if the majority of people think something, there's no possible way it's true - they're just a victim of herd mentality.

So in your world, apparently no one can blame you and a handful of other people of being collaboratively dumb, without also blaming all opinions of all majorities at all times while at it?

Well, glad to see someone with his two feet so firmly on a floating boat.

twooffour said:

For those too thick to get it - this is just another instance where I'm not the one starting to post off-topic personal bullshit in someone's thread ;)

...

twooffour said:

Xhonzi, you've been a weirdo since I first read your posts about raising OT children, and you're still one now.

If you wanna read crazy perverted sex fantasies into a few sardonic remarks about a topic made fun of all the god damn time, please continue to do so. Whatever floats your boat.

twooffour said:

What a blatant, embarassing inability to comprehend irony.

In other words...

twooffour said:

Yea, that was a few personal jabs in the context of an on-topic response. You just jump in randomly with nothing more to say than "oh this mean twofour, this mean twofour, he so annoying please go away, clownpicture".

And you're reacting the same way, whether it's a completely sensible contribution in the Politics thread, or one in a more challenging tone as here - so stop pretending otherwise.
It won't be paid for, it won't be bought.

twooffour said:

Yea, that was a few personal jabs in the context of an on-topic response. You just jump in randomly with nothing more to say than "oh this mean twofour, this mean twofour, he so annoying please go away, clownpicture".

And you're reacting the same way, whether it's a completely sensible contribution in the Politics thread, or one in a more challenging tone as here - so stop pretending otherwise.
It won't be paid for, it won't be bought.

Please go away.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/01/making_out_is_its_own_reward.html

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

Yea, that was a few personal jabs in the context of an on-topic response. You just jump in randomly with nothing more to say than "oh this mean twofour, this mean twofour, he so annoying please go away, clownpicture".

And you're reacting the same way, whether it's a completely sensible contribution in the Politics thread, or one in a more challenging tone as here - so stop pretending otherwise.
It won't be paid for, it won't be bought.

Please go away.

I love how you're only resorting to this empty soundbite after your laughable attempt at a rebuke fell flat ;)

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

Yea, that was a few personal jabs in the context of an on-topic response. You just jump in randomly with nothing more to say than "oh this mean twofour, this mean twofour, he so annoying please go away, clownpicture".

And you're reacting the same way, whether it's a completely sensible contribution in the Politics thread, or one in a more challenging tone as here - so stop pretending otherwise.
It won't be paid for, it won't be bought.

Please go away.

I love how you're only resorting to this empty soundbite after your laughable attempt at a rebuke fell flat ;)

As long as you keep trying to win these discussions, people will continue to want you to go away.  Of course, I know you actually like this, which is why you keep doing it.

But really, I just want you to go away.

*can't clear the cache on the computer I'm using right now, so here's a picture of a sad dog face*

twooffour said:
*can't clear the cache on the computer I'm using right now, so here's a picture of a sad dog face*

Well, yea.
You were supposed to imagine it.

Oh, well I did.  It looked like this:

Wrong Picture.

TV's Frink said:

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/01/making_out_is_its_own_reward.html

In case this gets lost in the twooffloatsam and jetsam.

Also, I should mention that that story was the first link that came up when I googled "Roger Ebert Sex."

I should also mention I'm now on a Sex Offender watch list.

Sorry.

Ziggy Stardust said:

CP3S said:

Ziggy isn't the only one who has thought of leaving this place for a while in hopes that twooffour will get bored/a life/laid/hit by a bus.

Fixed.

I don't think that was necessary.  Nor accurate, if his discussion with C3 about college a while back is to be believed.

Sort of reminds me of a few times in the past where other forum trolls have claimed I had never been laid, my two children notwithstanding.

Are calling me a troll?

Not saying that it's not true...

Anyway, post fixed. I guess I didn't notice the conversation between those two, because I usually skim read through 2/4's posts.

Speaking of you having children, it's gotta be awesome for them to have you as a father.

I was callling 2/4 the troll, sorry that wasn't clear.

...

And I think it's awesome having me as a father, but they might just be following the herd ;-)

Are your children also office chairs with sunglasses, or do they take after the other side of the family? ;-)