A long-winded reply that starts out by admitting the poster didn't even read the (relatively short) original article? Do not want.
The ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER, not the article, you CLOWN.
And it was only long-winded because I actually cared to make arguments and provide examples, rather than just saying "it sux".
I guess that makes a post worse, though....
And yes, the article makes some sweeping statements that are simply not true. A lot of people actually like their cinema and TV suspenseful and tense, not knowing what's gonna happen next. Glad you picked up on it.