CP3S said:

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

And on top of that, they're all based on something that isn't true.

Don't be a hypocrite. Prove it or shut the hell up.

The burden of proof lies with the one making the claim.
Religious claims require evidence to be valid, not "proofs of the opposite" to be invalid.

Again, that's rational discourse / skepticism 101 - you REALLY shouldn't be yawning at certain "lectures".

Twobyfour, in a topic where you and I essentially agree, I can't help but really wish we weren't on the same side because you consistently come off sounding like a complete bafoon.

All due respect for your experiences and research papers, that's far more expertise than I can claim at this time - but if I have to break down burden of proof to somebody who apparently has no clue (while acting aggressively abot it), then I'm bloody well gonna come off as condescending and arrogant even if you SUE me.

Now that aside, can't we just be like mature adults, and keep agreeing on what we agree on, while still hating each others' guts? ;)
Actually, I take that back, I don't hate yours - your recent posts on this topic were awesome :D