
- Time
- Post link
I tried the internet high five and I knocked my monitor off the table.
I tried the internet high five and I knocked my monitor off the table.
internet smiling facepalm.
VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader
Captain America
I'm not sure what everyone's problem is, I freaking loved this movie. I'm putting it up there with Iron Man in the Marvel Universe pantheon. Something about having a hero that was actually heroic, a villain who did villainous things, and actors who took it seriously made it pretty awesome. I liked how it made Cap real, everyone knew who he was and everyone looked up to him. I admit, a lot of the relationships were rushed (I'm pretty sure I read that the writers rushed through a lot of the war so whoever makes a Cap 2 has the option of putting it in the 1940's or in the 2010's), but the point was gotten across that Cap was everyone's friend and just a nice guy. A welcome change from the "tortured, emo, ass" department we've been getting recently.
I think its great that even though each of these movies was written by different people and different companies, they all tie into one another and almost have to be watched in the order they came out to truly understand them. Usually when you have a villain who says that a particular artifact was from "the storehouse of Odin himself", you'd think, "this guy is off his rocker". However, we've SEEN this storehouse, he may be smarter than we give him credit for.
5 Avengers out of 6 Avengers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time Collectors: Return of the Giants
Some of my teenaged friends saw this locally made movie and knew I had to see it, so they came over Sunday night to show it to me. Wow, its really bad. It's a "Faith Friendly" direct-to-DVD movie, so you can't expect too much from it, but it could have been a lot better. I'm not sure what the worst part was, the bad acting, the bad cinematography, the bad science, the bad theology, the bad effects...
I tried to explain the plot, but it boils down to this: old archaeologist dies, grandson finds that he discovered bones of Biblical giants, which could disprove evolution, old men drive by his house, then try to steal said bones. I think that gives it too much credit though.
It's really bad, I wish it was streaming somewhere so you all could experience it.
0 giants returned out of 40
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress
Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress
doubleofive said:
Captain America
...
I tried to explain the plot, but it boils down to this: old archaeologist dies, grandson finds that he discovered bones of Biblical giants, which could disprove evolution, old men drive by his house, then try to steal said bones. I think that gives it too much credit though.
It's really bad, I wish it was streaming somewhere so you all could experience it.
0 giants returned out of 40
This is how I read this post. I was like, "what."
Keep Circulating the Tapes.
END OF LINE
(It hasn’t happened yet)
Don't skim my posts! I work hard on them!Tyrphanax said:
doubleofive said:
Captain America
...
I tried to explain the plot, but it boils down to this: old archaeologist dies, grandson finds that he discovered bones of Biblical giants, which could disprove evolution, old men drive by his house, then try to steal said bones. I think that gives it too much credit though.
It's really bad, I wish it was streaming somewhere so you all could experience it.
0 giants returned out of 40
This is how I read this post. I was like, "what."
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress
Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress
doubleofive said:
Captain America
[...]but the point was gotten across that Cap was everyone's friend and just a nice guy.
SNORE!
I'm not sure what everyone's problem is, I freaking loved this movie. I'm putting it up there with Iron Man in the Marvel Universe pantheon. Something about having a hero that was actually heroic, a villain who did villainous things, and actors who took it seriously made it pretty awesome.
Boooo! You say that seeing this "nice guy" boyscout superhero is a breath of fresh air from the recent brooding hero's we've seen, but that's exactly what Iron Man was, only Favreau and Downy Jr. did it well. I'm sorry, but this movie was boring as shit.
And hell, maybe it isn't fully the movies fault. I've got nothing against Joe Johnston, and Chris Evans proved in Sunshine that he's not completely useless. But I'm sure there's a reason they never made a Cap movie before now (that wasn't straight to video) - he's just not a very interesting character. There isn't any real dynamic, nothing's at stake. We know right from the beginning of the film that he's going to win, kill Red Skull (who looked stupid IMHO), and somehow get frozen for 70 years!!
Of course, there's also the fact that this movie was forced out and most likely rushed to theaters before the Avengers movie comes out next spring. Again, not the movies fault, but it's kind of obvious. It was the same case for Thor a couple months ago - the movies just don't have any reason to be there, they're completely unnecessary additions to the Marvel Universe pantheon. But at least Thor was amazing to look at, and had some intriguing storylines. The First Avenger was just, plain boring.
As one reviewer from the Village Voice puts it, the movie is a "hokey, hacky, two-hour-plus exercise in franchise transition/price gouging, complete with utterly unnecessary post-converted 3-D"
Agree to disagree then.
I guess I'm an old man now, and not hip with it.
Frink, what's that like? ;-)
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress
Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress
doubleofive said:
I guess I'm an old man now, and not hip with it.
Frink, what's that like? ;-)
I wouldn't know.
doubleofive said:
Agree to disagree then.
I guess I'm an old man now, and not hip with it.
Frink, what's that like? ;-)
005: I'm with you too! <wrong pic of Luke>
I would probably give it 7.5 balls out of 10, 8 if I had to round up. I really enjoyed it and found it to be quite moving in places.
I think you have to post here whether you liked it and what country you're from, because I'm curious if the feared correlation actually exists, or if it's just a figment of the producers imagination:
xhonzi: 7.5/10 USA
005: 8.33 USA
Red5: 5.5/10 ?
FanFiltration: 5/10 ?
But I agree with some of the statements- the first half was stronger than the last half. Some of the "jokes" were a little too corny (fondue) and didn't play very well.
But I found the 3D to be subtle and enjoyable. And I found the CG to be at worst "good enough" and at best "how did they make skinny Rogers so skinny?"
If you doubt that Captain America can be a very compelling character, then you really need to read the first many issues (I've read through 50 or so) of this:
http://www.comicvine.com/captain-america/49-11499/?page=4
It might even make you a believer out of Bucky. Though the movie version of Bucky wasn't too shabby.
IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!
"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005
"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM
"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.
Kind of amusing for those that have seen Captain America:
Agent Peggy Carter once had a (much) younger sister named Sharon who hooks up with Cap when he comes out of the ice 20 years later.
Currently in Marvel Comics: Peggy Carter has a niece who hooks up with Cap when he's taken off ice 35 years later.
Now that Cap has been in the ice 70 years... who is Sharon Carter to Peggy?
IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!
"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005
"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM
"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.
Granddaughter. Any True Blood fans here? LOL
I'm from the states, by the way - a good old midwesterner from Ohio. And I thought it was bullocks. But like 005 said, to each their own!
RedFive said:
I'm ... from Ohio. And I thought it was bullocks.
Hmm... that's kind of suspicious.
You might be one of those English Illegals Warbler is always warning us about.
IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!
"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005
"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM
"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.
xhonzi said:
RedFive said:
I'm ... from Ohio. And I thought it was bullocks.
Hmm... that's kind of suspicious.
You might be one of those English Illegals Warbler is always warning us about.
Maybe he's just a uncastrated male bovine animal.
(Think he meant "bollocks")
I'm just a big fan...
Mefink you a limey.
IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!
"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005
"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM
"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.
He could be an antipodean, they say it too.
Rabbit Hole - 10/10
Since they're like poetry, what with the rhyming and all, I find that I only need to watch three out of the six films.
A few of my friends (who's opinions on movies I trust) said they loved Captain America too, so maybe it was just me. Eh..
Anyway, I saw Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 recently, and as an outsider I really enjoyed it. This is the first Potter movie I've seen since the first one way back when, so I had no idea who was who or anything like that, but I figured it out as I went.
The battle at Hogwarts was freakin awesome to watch, especially the scene where they were flying through it all. Some really great effects. Plus, I was pleasantly surprised by the work of David Yates, who really put his own mark on the movie, which I didn't expect for part 7 of a 7 part series.
Overall, I'd give it a solid 7/10. Maybe it'd be higher if I had some context, but I doubt I'll ever read the books (or, for that matter, see the other movies).
Saw Captain America, liked Captain America, I'd say SEE Captain America.
RedFive said:
Plus, I was pleasantly surprised by the work of David Yates, who really put his own mark on the movie, which I didn't expect for part 7 of a 7 part series.
Actually, each Potter film is pretty different in style and look.
"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas
<span> </span>
'The Rocketeer'
10 pieces of gum out of 10 rocket packs...
<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>
EyeShotFirst said:
RedFive said:
Plus, I was pleasantly surprised by the work of David Yates, who really put his own mark on the movie, which I didn't expect for part 7 of a 7 part series.
Actually, each Potter film is pretty different in style and look.
Also, Yates has directed every installment since #5. So he's done 4 Potter movies (3 if you count the two Deathly Hallowses as a single film), more than any other Potter director. (Interestingly, his films are all my favorites, despite the fact that 5 and 6 change a lot from the books.)
I also quite enjoyed HP7.5, but I don't think I can separate part 1 from part 2 and judge them on their own merits. I'm definitely cutting them together as a single film when part 2 comes out on DVD/Blu-Ray. (Not cutting anything out either, but I don't mind a 4.5-hour long movie - the "uncut" version of Das Boot is my favorite and it's 4 and a half hours long, too.)
Anyway, most recent movie I've seen:
Cowboys & Aliens
The first hour of it was absolutely magnificent, with great performances, great direction, and a compelling story long before the aliens arrive. In fact, I'd absolutely love to have seen just the Cowboys side of this flick, without any of the Aliens.
Ford's Dolarhyde and Craig's Lonergan are initially set up as antagonist and protagonist (respectively), but Craig's character has enough dark shades so as to be potentially as dangerous as Dolarhyde, if not more so. One of the best moments in the film comes when Lonergan is chained to a wagon together with Paul Dano's Percy (Dolarhyde's son) - as the aliens begin to attack, Lonergan asks Percy to give him his hand.
"Why?" asks Percy.
"I can get us out of here," responds Lonergan.
Warily, Percy raises his shackled hand to Lonergan ... who promptly breaks his wrist in order to get the shackle off.
At this point I should mention that the supporting cast - from Dano to Sam Rockwell to Keith Carradine - are all fantastic, especially Dano and Rockwell. Olivia Wilde isn't particularly revelatory - if you liked her in her past work, you'll like her here.
Now here we run into my problem with the movie - the last half hour.
The beginning 10 minutes of the film is essentially The Bourne Identity plus A Fistful of Dollars. Then the Bourne aspect gradually fades as District 9 and Aliens get thrown into the mix.
All of this is great, very enjoyable, and I loved almost every minute of it.
Then for the last half hour it turns into Independece Day on horseback in the desert.
Which is fine if you weren't expecting the moral ambiguity of the two leads to continue to be the driving force of the movie ... but it doesn't. In fact, their shades of gray almost entirely evaporate by the time the final battle starts. Both Dolarhyde and Lonergan are essentailly heroes at this point, and they don't really do anything that could be considered morally reprehensible for the last act of the film.
That's not quite what I was expecting. It felt like the studio got the original script, liked the first 2/3 of it, then said, "Well, we're giving you a bunch of money to do this, so make them good guys by the end." This idea may be supported by the fact that there are, like, 6 writers credited on the film.
So in the end, I found it very enjoyable, but all the complexity and nuance just vanishes in the last half hour.
7/10.
^Thanks for that, I'll wait for the blu-ray now...
And now that I think of it, I saw Harry Potter #6 in theaters because a girl I was seeing wanted to see it, and I absolutely loathed it. It was so boring.
RedFive said:
^Thanks for that, I'll wait for the blu-ray now...
And now that I think of it, I saw Harry Potter #6 in theaters because a girl I was seeing wanted to see it, and I absolutely loathed it. It was so boring.
I liked parts of it, but feel it was bogged down with too much of the love element. Of course it was the same in the book, so the movie was just being faithful.
"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas
<span> </span>
I still really wish they'd focused more on the flashbacks to Voldemort's past in #6. They also dealt very poorly with the Harry/Ginny relationship throughout all the films (the last two are no exception in this), mainly in cutting their conversation after Dumbledore's death (which I felt was very important character-wise).
Other than that, Yates' entries (5, 6, and both of 7) were easily my favorites of the series, followed closely by 3. (The first two are pretty good, but 4 just blows chunks until the last half hour.)