Gaffer Tape said:

Oh, I'm so sorry. It's just that when you said I'd hit the nail on the head when I said that you would invalidate every contribution if Frink hadn't read a post of yours, I assumed that must be what you meant. It's hard to keep up when you keep changing the rules, though. I guess you just didn't read my post closely enough, or you would have caught that. And if you can't keep up with an ongoing conversation, you really shouldn't be participating in it. Or is that still the rule? Have you changed that one yet?

"Oh yea, and congrats on thinking I took your "Saturday Evening Post" "gag" at face value."

Sorry, I didn't just mean the Saturday Evening Post part, I meant the entire "hyperbolic sarcasm part", including whatever about the rest of Frink's life, or whatever.

Guess I should've clarified, seeing as how everything has to be spoonfed to you.
I thought you'd understand that I'm, like, referring to the "serious core" of your inept attempt at hyperbolic parody.

You might've caught up on that when I said:

"I laughed when reading this, but on a serious note (only because you're seemingly not getting it):

Yea, that's it in a nutshell, basically."

Well, apparently you didn't.
I have a new rule, though - from this moment on, I'm going to treat you like a toddler with Asperger's. I must say, I've never met a women in real life that behaved on par with a toddler with Asperger's. But I'm gonna take this into account now.