Post #514928

Gaffer Tape said:

twooffour said:

You just kinda fail at sarcasm.

 Really?  Can you back that up?  Because I don't see you backing that up.  I just see you sorta dancing around it and avoiding it.

You're easily forgetting that in that same post where you "approved" of my banal comment about homosexuality in Politics (about as banal as this one), you then went on to act like a disingenuous dick.

Um, nope, you must not have read my post right, nor not read all of it, or thought about not reading it.  I guess I should dismiss the rest of your post because what I was saying should be obvious to anyone who read it.  Because the only other contribution I made in that post was voting in TV Frink's poll.  Maybe the fact that I voted for you was enough to get you riled up, but I would hardly call that being a "disingenuous dick."  But what do I know?  My opinions are just opinions after all.  Your opinions are facts... somehow.  I still haven't figured out how that is, though.  Perhaps you could spend about three yards' worth of text on a rambling post that goes nowhere, mentions "irony" about five times, "holding water" about three, and making claims of "backing stuff up" about nine times, with about half a dozen quote boxes in it to explain it to me again? ^_^

Why you fail at sarcasm? Because you act as if simply repeating back lines at me were somehow good biting sarcasm, while actually coming off as more stupid as you want to portray me.

Where I'm backing it up? Maybe right in the next paragraph, which you're... quoting and replying to in your next paragraph?
Gee, you're a funny one!

Yea, you "voted against me", let's look at that. (And we already have.)
So you ask me why I should think that if everyone thinks I'm an ass (and they're okay), could I consider that maybe I'm the problem?

Well, I'm posting a lengthy response to that.
Your reaction? Dismissing it entirely, still insisting that I WAS the problem, and "deserving" of the criticism.
Almost as if you already had made up your mind before asking, and whatever I'd have babbled together, it wouldn't have ever mattered.

Now, I might've justified conclusively and beyond all doubt (hey, I said might) why I thought otherwise.
And whether I was right about it or not, you hadn't even begun to address any of that, and from the looks, you might as well have been cluelessly insisting on your (now rebuked) version, which you wouldn't know as you hadn't read it, eh?
Which pretty much made me right at the time being (and still continues to this moment, as you haven't caught up yet).

But forget all that - I just got "riled up" because "you voted against me".
It wasn't a dick move on your part in any way, and you also didn't come off as stupid in any form or shape.
I should've just swallowed your vote, and been nice as you'd helped me out so much with that important Politics contribution!



Here's the thing, dear - if you weren't being such a disingenuous dick RIGHT NOW, I wouldn't have been forced to retell this boring story for the x-th time.

You had that reaction, coming, and it's pretty pathetic of you to try and pretend otherwise.
And with that said, you failed at the sarcasm :D

Your opinions are facts... somehow.  I still haven't figured out how that is, though.

Perhaps you could spend about three yards' worth of text on a rambling post that goes nowhere